Addressing the reproducibility crisis, one protocol at a time.
Scientific reproducibility is in crisis. Studies show that over 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments. ReplicateScience addresses this by transforming dense Methods sections from scientific papers into clear, step-by-step protocols that any lab can follow.
We believe that science advances when experiments can be verified and built upon. Our platform makes this possible by providing structured, evidence-backed protocols extracted from open-access literature.
We collect open-access scientific papers from sources like PubMed Central, bioRxiv, and medRxiv. Our system extracts the Methods section and key metadata while respecting licensing terms.
Using advanced AI, we identify distinct experiments within each paper and transform them into structured protocols. Every step is backed by evidence quotes from the original text.
We identify all materials, equipment, and reagents mentioned in the protocol and map them to available products. This helps researchers quickly source everything they need.
Before publication, each protocol undergoes review to ensure accuracy. We verify that steps are complete, evidence quotes are accurate, and product mappings make sense.
ReplicateScience is developed by ConductScience, a leading provider of scientific equipment for behavioral research. With years of experience supplying labs worldwide, we understand the challenges researchers face in replicating published work.
Our product catalog integration helps researchers quickly identify and source the equipment they need to reproduce experiments. However, ReplicateScience is designed to be useful regardless of where you purchase your equipment.
Have questions, suggestions, or want to submit a paper for extraction? We'd love to hear from you.
Every claim in our protocols is backed by verbatim quotes from the source paper. We never invent or hallucinate information.
We only process papers that are freely available. No paywalls, no copyright violations.
Original authors are always credited. Every protocol links back to the source paper with DOI.
We welcome corrections and suggestions from the community to improve protocol accuracy.