Source Paper
Spatial learning impairment parallels the magnitude of dorsal hippocampal lesions, but is hardly present following ventral lesions
E Moser, MB Moser, P Andersen
Journal of Neuroscience • 1993
View Abstract
The hippocampus plays an essential role in spatial learning. To investigate whether the whole structure is equally important, we compared the effects of variously sized and localized hippocampal aspiration lesions on spatial learning in a Morris water maze. The volume of all hippocampal lesions was determined. Dorsal hippocampal lesions consistently impaired spatial learning more than equally large ventral lesions. The dorsal lesions had to be larger than 20% of the total hippocampal volume to prolong final escape latencies. The acquisition rate and precision on a probe test without platform were sensitive to even smaller dorsal lesions. The degree of impairment correlated with the lesion volume. In contrast, the lesions of the ventral half of the hippocampus spared both the rate and the precision of learning unless nearly all of the ventral half was removed. There was no significant effect of the location (dorsal or ventral) of damage to the overlying neocortex only. In conclusion, the dorsal half of the hippocampus appears more important for spatial learning than the ventral half. The spatial learning ability seems related to the amount of damaged dorsal hippocampal tissue, with a threshold at about 20% of the total hippocampal volume, under which normal learning can occur.
Probe Test
Objective: Measure acquisition rate and precision of spatial learning following hippocampal lesions using a probe test without platform in a Morris water maze
This is a Probe Test protocol using Not explicitly stated as the model organism. The procedure involves 2 procedural steps, 1 equipment items. Extracted from a 1993 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
Not explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated • unknown • Not explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Conduct probe test without platform • Measure escape latencies
Primary readouts
- Acquisition rate on probe test
- Precision on probe test
- Final escape latencies
- Correlation between lesion volume and degree of impairment
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
- Verify the animal model, intervention setup, and collection timepoints against the source paper.
- Check that every direct vendor link matches the exact specification your lab plans to run.
Use the page like this
- Work through the protocol steps in order and use the inline vendor chips only when you need to source or verify an item.
- Jump to Experimental Context for readouts, data shape, and analysis flow before planning downstream analysis.
Protocol Steps
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Conduct probe test without platform
Perform a probe test in the Morris water maze without the platform present to measure spatial learning acquisition rate and precision
Note: This test is sensitive to even smaller dorsal hippocampal lesions and measures both acquisition rate and precision of spatial learning
View evidence from paper
“The acquisition rate and precision on a probe test without platform were sensitive to even smaller dorsal lesions.”
Measure escape latencies
Record final escape latencies as a measure of spatial learning performance
Note: Dorsal lesions larger than 20% of total hippocampal volume prolong final escape latencies
View evidence from paper
“The dorsal lesions had to be larger than 20% of the total hippocampal volume to prolong final escape latencies.”