Comprehensive behavioral analysis of the Cdkl5 knockout mice revealed significant enhancement in anxiety- and fear-related behaviors and impairment in both acquisition and long-term retention of spatial reference memory methods
Show snapshot details
On this page
This experiment, in seven questions
Jump straight to the part of the recipe you need. Data and provenance labels stay close to the action they support.
Shopping and prep list
What do I need before I start?
Biological model pending
Subject model for the experiment.
- Use
- confirm full cohort details in the source paper
Before you run
What should be confirmed before execution?
First confirmation
Species or subject information is missing.
Confirm before execution
Protocol does not list structured equipment.
Confirm before execution
This page shows passages quoted from the paper. Equipment, materials, times, and temperatures are hidden until the page is rebuilt from the full paper and checked by a reviewer. Check the paper before using this method.
Confirm before execution
Open the source paper before finalizing run-specific details.
Procurement checkpoint
Use source-stated vendors where present. Treat mapped products as sourcing options unless the page marks an exact source match.
Open quote workflowStep-by-step procedure
What do I do, in order?
Cdkl5 -/Y mice show significantly enhanced anxiety-like behaviors
We performed the open field test for total duration of 120 minutes. In this test, exploration of a brightly lit, novel and unprotected environment is assessed during the first 5 minutes, and general activities during habituation to novelty are scored across a longer time [ ]. In the whole period, there was no significant difference of total distance traveled between two genotypes (F 1,42 = 0.063, p = 0.8038, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ); however, during the first 5 minutes, Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a marked decrease of the traveled distance compared to control mice ( ). The vertical activity of Cdkl5 -/Y mice was significantly decreased compared to control mice (F 1,42 = 17.73, p = 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The center time of Cdkl5 -/Y mice in the whole period was not significantly different from that of control mice (F 1,42 = 1.932, p = 0.1719, two-way repeated m...
Cdkl5 -/Y mice exhibit a mild alteration in the gait
Previous studies reported impaired motor coordination of Cdkl5 KO mice, using the rotarod and CatWalk tests [, ]. We also identified an altered gait of our Cdkl5 -/Y mice. The stride pattern of the front paws (% of brake duration: F 1,38 = 5.92, p = 0.0198, one-way ANOVA, ) and the angles of hind paws (F 1,38 = 7.451, p = 0.0096, one-way ANOVA, ) were significantly different, and the stance widths of both front and hind paws were significantly shorter (front paw: F 1,38 = 4.58, p = 0.0388, one-way ANOVA, hind paw: F 1,38 = 7.708, p = 0.0085, one-way ANOVA, ). These results suggest a mild coordination disturbance in our Cdkl5 KO mice. The one-day rotarod test showed no significant difference in the latency to fall between genotypes (F 1,42 = 1.36, p = 0.2502, one-way ANOVA, ).
Cdkl5 -/Y mice exhibit a mild alteration in the gait
(A) Gait analysis of front paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) Percent of stride duration. Cdkl5 KO mice show a significantly lower percentage of brake duration. (ii) Percent of stance duration. There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly shorter stance width. (iv) There is no significant difference in the stride length between two genotypes. (v) There is no significant difference in the step angle between two genotypes. (vi) There is no significant difference in the paw angle between two genotypes. (B) Gait analysis of hind paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) There are no significant differences in the duration of swing, brake, or propel between two genotypes. (ii) There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/...
Cdkl5 -/Y mice show significantly enhanced anxiety-like behaviors
(A-D) The light/dark transition test. (A) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased distance traveled in the light chamber and an increased distance in the dark chamber. (B) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased stay time in the light chamber. (C) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased number of transitions between chambers. (D) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a tendency to increase in the latency to light chamber, but without statistical significance. (E-H) The open field test. (E) (i) Total distance traveled (cm) in 120 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in 5 minutes. There is no significant difference between two genotypes (p = 0.8038). (ii) Total distance traveled during the first 5 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in one minute. Marked reduction in the distance traveled of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is observed. (F) The vertical activity. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a signific...
Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered
In order to evaluate the social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice, we conducted the social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test) ( ), three-chamber test ( ), and 24-hour home cage monitoring ( ). In the one-chamber test, we measured the total duration of contacts ( ), mean duration per contact ( ), number of contacts ( ), total duration of active contacts ( ), and distance traveled ( ). Active contacts denote physical contacts of two mice that run into each other and continue the locomotion for longer than 2 cm. Whereas physical contacts that reflect the social interaction correspond to spontaneous touching, rubbing, or sniffing behaviors toward each other, active contacts can occur just upon chance encounters during locomotion. The duration of active contacts should be greatly influenced by the activity level of the mice, and can be viewed as a parameter to reflect t...
Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered
(A-E) The social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant increase in the total duration of contacts (A), a significant increase in the mean duration per contact (B), a significant decrease in the number of contacts (C), a significant decrease in the total duration of active contacts (D), and a significant decrease in the distance traveled (E). Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 11 pairs; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 11 pairs. Data indicate means ± SEM. (F-K) The three-chamber social interaction test. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant decrease in the total distance traveled (F), and a tendency toward decrease in the average speed (G). (H) Time spent in each chamber (sec). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant preference for the center chamber, whereas Cdkl5 +/Y mice spend significantly more time in other chambers. (I) Time spent around cage (sec). Cdkl5 +/Y mice sp...
Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered
Twenty-four hour monitoring in the home cage under familiar conditions was conducted for one week to analyze the interaction and circadian activities of Cdkl5 KO mice. Social interaction was measured by counting the number of "particle", which represents an image of each mouse (see ); two particles indicated that the mice were not in contact with each other, and one particle indicated contact between them. Cdkl5 -/Y mice spent significantly more time staying together compared to control mice during daytime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 75.79, p < 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ), but not in the nighttime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 1.444, p = 0.2436, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The genotype difference during the whole period was significant (F 1,20 = 14.166, p = 0.0012, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The activity level of Cdkl5 -/Y mice w...
Three-chamber social interaction test
The three-chamber social interaction test was performed as previously described [ ]. The testing apparatus consisted of a rectangular, three-chambered box and a lid with an infrared video camera (O'hara & Co., Tokyo). Each chamber was 20 cm x 40 cm x 22 cm and the dividing walls were made of clear Plexiglas, with small square openings (5 x 3 cm) allowing access into each chamber. An unfamiliar C57BL/6 male (stranger 1), that had had no prior contact with the subject mouse, was placed in one of the side chambers. The location of stranger 1 in the left vs. right side chamber was systematically alternated between trials. The stranger mouse was enclosed in a small, round wire cage, which allowed nose contact between the bars, but prevented fighting. The cage was 11 cm in height, with a bottom diameter of 9 cm, vertical bars 0.5 cm, and horizontal bars spaced 1 cm apart. The subject...
Measurement outputs
What raw and processed outputs should exist?
Gait recovery and locomotor function
- Raw artifact
- Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
- Processed artifact
- Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
- Reported as
- Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Analysis plan
How should the outputs become interpretable results?
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
inferred from protocolPreprocessing / cleaning
Review raw outputs for quality, remove unusable captures, and organize the data into a comparison-ready table or image set.
inferred from protocolScoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Gait recovery and locomotor function.
from paperStatistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
inferred from protocolReporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Gait recovery and locomotor function.
inferred from protocolSource and audit
What supports the facts on this page?
Evidence quotes (8)
We performed the open field test for total duration of 120 minutes. In this test, exploration of a brightly lit, novel and unprotected environment is assessed during the first 5 minutes, and general activities during habituation to novelty are scored across a longer time [ ]. In the whole period, there was no significant difference of total distance traveled between two genotypes (F 1,42 = 0.063, p = 0.8038, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ); however, during the first 5 minutes, Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a marked decrease of the traveled distance compared to control mice ( ). The vertical activity of Cdkl5 -/Y mice was significantly decreased compared to control mice (F 1,42 = 17.73, p = 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The center time of Cdkl5 -/Y mice in the whole period was not significantly different from that of control mice (F 1,42 = 1.932, p = 0.1719, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). However, Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a marked decrease in the center time during the first 5 minutes (see the first bin in ). There was no significant genotype difference of total stereotypic counts in the whole period (F 1,42 = 0.254, p = 0.6166, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ), but...
Previous studies reported impaired motor coordination of Cdkl5 KO mice, using the rotarod and CatWalk tests [, ]. We also identified an altered gait of our Cdkl5 -/Y mice. The stride pattern of the front paws (% of brake duration: F 1,38 = 5.92, p = 0.0198, one-way ANOVA, ) and the angles of hind paws (F 1,38 = 7.451, p = 0.0096, one-way ANOVA, ) were significantly different, and the stance widths of both front and hind paws were significantly shorter (front paw: F 1,38 = 4.58, p = 0.0388, one-way ANOVA, hind paw: F 1,38 = 7.708, p = 0.0085, one-way ANOVA, ). These results suggest a mild coordination disturbance in our Cdkl5 KO mice. The one-day rotarod test showed no significant difference in the latency to fall between genotypes (F 1,42 = 1.36, p = 0.2502, one-way ANOVA, ).
(A) Gait analysis of front paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) Percent of stride duration. Cdkl5 KO mice show a significantly lower percentage of brake duration. (ii) Percent of stance duration. There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly shorter stance width. (iv) There is no significant difference in the stride length between two genotypes. (v) There is no significant difference in the step angle between two genotypes. (vi) There is no significant difference in the paw angle between two genotypes. (B) Gait analysis of hind paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) There are no significant differences in the duration of swing, brake, or propel between two genotypes. (ii) There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly shorter stance width. (iv) There is no significant difference in the stride length between two genotypes. (v) There is no significant difference in the step angle between two genotypes. (vi) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly small paw angle compared with the control. (C...
(A-D) The light/dark transition test. (A) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased distance traveled in the light chamber and an increased distance in the dark chamber. (B) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased stay time in the light chamber. (C) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased number of transitions between chambers. (D) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a tendency to increase in the latency to light chamber, but without statistical significance. (E-H) The open field test. (E) (i) Total distance traveled (cm) in 120 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in 5 minutes. There is no significant difference between two genotypes (p = 0.8038). (ii) Total distance traveled during the first 5 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in one minute. Marked reduction in the distance traveled of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is observed. (F) The vertical activity. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased vertical activity in the whole period, compared with the control mice (p = 0.0001). There is a significant time x genotype effect (p = 0.0004). (G) Center time (sec). In the whole period, there is no significant difference of the center time between two genotypes (p = 0.1719). Howeve...
In order to evaluate the social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice, we conducted the social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test) ( ), three-chamber test ( ), and 24-hour home cage monitoring ( ). In the one-chamber test, we measured the total duration of contacts ( ), mean duration per contact ( ), number of contacts ( ), total duration of active contacts ( ), and distance traveled ( ). Active contacts denote physical contacts of two mice that run into each other and continue the locomotion for longer than 2 cm. Whereas physical contacts that reflect the social interaction correspond to spontaneous touching, rubbing, or sniffing behaviors toward each other, active contacts can occur just upon chance encounters during locomotion. The duration of active contacts should be greatly influenced by the activity level of the mice, and can be viewed as a parameter to reflect their activity. Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a significant increase in the total duration of contacts (F 1,20 = 8.691, p = 0.008, one-way ANOVA, ) and mean duration per contact (F 1,20 = 35.588, p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA, ), whereas they showed a significant decrease in the number of contacts (F 1,20 = 30.3...
(A-E) The social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant increase in the total duration of contacts (A), a significant increase in the mean duration per contact (B), a significant decrease in the number of contacts (C), a significant decrease in the total duration of active contacts (D), and a significant decrease in the distance traveled (E). Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 11 pairs; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 11 pairs. Data indicate means ± SEM. (F-K) The three-chamber social interaction test. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant decrease in the total distance traveled (F), and a tendency toward decrease in the average speed (G). (H) Time spent in each chamber (sec). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant preference for the center chamber, whereas Cdkl5 +/Y mice spend significantly more time in other chambers. (I) Time spent around cage (sec). Cdkl5 +/Y mice spend significantly more time around the mouse cage compared to the empty cage. Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a tendency toward preference for the mouse cage without statistical significance. (J) Number of entries in each chamber. Both genotypes similarly show a significant difference between the center and s...
Twenty-four hour monitoring in the home cage under familiar conditions was conducted for one week to analyze the interaction and circadian activities of Cdkl5 KO mice. Social interaction was measured by counting the number of "particle", which represents an image of each mouse (see ); two particles indicated that the mice were not in contact with each other, and one particle indicated contact between them. Cdkl5 -/Y mice spent significantly more time staying together compared to control mice during daytime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 75.79, p < 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ), but not in the nighttime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 1.444, p = 0.2436, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The genotype difference during the whole period was significant (F 1,20 = 14.166, p = 0.0012, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The activity level of Cdkl5 -/Y mice was significantly decreased compared to control mice during daytime (F 1,20 = 18.252, p = 0.0004, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ), but not in the nighttime (F 1,20 = 2.201, p = 0.1535, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The mean values of those recorded in the middle three days clearly showed a s...
The three-chamber social interaction test was performed as previously described [ ]. The testing apparatus consisted of a rectangular, three-chambered box and a lid with an infrared video camera (O'hara & Co., Tokyo). Each chamber was 20 cm x 40 cm x 22 cm and the dividing walls were made of clear Plexiglas, with small square openings (5 x 3 cm) allowing access into each chamber. An unfamiliar C57BL/6 male (stranger 1), that had had no prior contact with the subject mouse, was placed in one of the side chambers. The location of stranger 1 in the left vs. right side chamber was systematically alternated between trials. The stranger mouse was enclosed in a small, round wire cage, which allowed nose contact between the bars, but prevented fighting. The cage was 11 cm in height, with a bottom diameter of 9 cm, vertical bars 0.5 cm, and horizontal bars spaced 1 cm apart. The subject mouse was first placed in the middle chamber and allowed to explore the entire social test box for a 10-min session. The amount of time spent in each chamber and number of entries into each chamber was measured. Each mouse was tested in a 10-min session to quantify social preference for the first st...
Machine-readable layer
[
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "Comprehensive behavioral analysis of the Cdkl5 knockout mice revealed significant enhancement in anxiety- and fear-related behaviors and impairment in both acquisition and long-term retention of spatial reference memory methods",
"description": "Protocol for Comprehensive behavioral analysis of the Cdkl5 knockout mice revealed significant enhancement in anxiety- and fear-related behaviors and impairment in both acquisition and long-term retention of spatial reference memory methods",
"step": [
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 1,
"name": "Cdkl5 -/Y mice show significantly enhanced anxiety-like behaviors",
"text": "We performed the open field test for total duration of 120 minutes. In this test, exploration of a brightly lit, novel and unprotected environment is assessed during the first 5 minutes, and general activities during habituation to novelty are scored across a longer time [ ]. In the whole period, there was no significant difference of total distance traveled between two genotypes (F 1,42 = 0.063, p = 0.8038, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ); however, during the first 5 minutes, Cdkl5 -/Y mice showed a marked decrease of the traveled distance compared to control mice ( ). The vertical activity of Cdkl5 -/Y mice was significantly decreased compared to control mice (F 1,42 = 17.73, p = 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The center time of Cdkl5 -/Y mice in the whole period was not significantly different from that of control mice (F 1,42 = 1.932, p = 0.1719, two-way repeated m..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 2,
"name": "Cdkl5 -/Y mice exhibit a mild alteration in the gait",
"text": "Previous studies reported impaired motor coordination of Cdkl5 KO mice, using the rotarod and CatWalk tests [, ]. We also identified an altered gait of our Cdkl5 -/Y mice. The stride pattern of the front paws (% of brake duration: F 1,38 = 5.92, p = 0.0198, one-way ANOVA, ) and the angles of hind paws (F 1,38 = 7.451, p = 0.0096, one-way ANOVA, ) were significantly different, and the stance widths of both front and hind paws were significantly shorter (front paw: F 1,38 = 4.58, p = 0.0388, one-way ANOVA, hind paw: F 1,38 = 7.708, p = 0.0085, one-way ANOVA, ). These results suggest a mild coordination disturbance in our Cdkl5 KO mice. The one-day rotarod test showed no significant difference in the latency to fall between genotypes (F 1,42 = 1.36, p = 0.2502, one-way ANOVA, )."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 3,
"name": "Cdkl5 -/Y mice exhibit a mild alteration in the gait",
"text": "(A) Gait analysis of front paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) Percent of stride duration. Cdkl5 KO mice show a significantly lower percentage of brake duration. (ii) Percent of stance duration. There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly shorter stance width. (iv) There is no significant difference in the stride length between two genotypes. (v) There is no significant difference in the step angle between two genotypes. (vi) There is no significant difference in the paw angle between two genotypes. (B) Gait analysis of hind paws. Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 22; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 19. (i) There are no significant differences in the duration of swing, brake, or propel between two genotypes. (ii) There is no significant difference in the duration of brake or propel between two genotypes. (iii) Cdkl5 -/..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 4,
"name": "Cdkl5 -/Y mice show significantly enhanced anxiety-like behaviors",
"text": "(A-D) The light/dark transition test. (A) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased distance traveled in the light chamber and an increased distance in the dark chamber. (B) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased stay time in the light chamber. (C) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significantly decreased number of transitions between chambers. (D) Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a tendency to increase in the latency to light chamber, but without statistical significance. (E-H) The open field test. (E) (i) Total distance traveled (cm) in 120 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in 5 minutes. There is no significant difference between two genotypes (p = 0.8038). (ii) Total distance traveled during the first 5 minutes. Each bin represents a mean value in one minute. Marked reduction in the distance traveled of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is observed. (F) The vertical activity. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a signific..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 5,
"name": "Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered",
"text": "In order to evaluate the social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice, we conducted the social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test) ( ), three-chamber test ( ), and 24-hour home cage monitoring ( ). In the one-chamber test, we measured the total duration of contacts ( ), mean duration per contact ( ), number of contacts ( ), total duration of active contacts ( ), and distance traveled ( ). Active contacts denote physical contacts of two mice that run into each other and continue the locomotion for longer than 2 cm. Whereas physical contacts that reflect the social interaction correspond to spontaneous touching, rubbing, or sniffing behaviors toward each other, active contacts can occur just upon chance encounters during locomotion. The duration of active contacts should be greatly influenced by the activity level of the mice, and can be viewed as a parameter to reflect t..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 6,
"name": "Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered",
"text": "(A-E) The social interaction test in a novel environment (one-chamber test). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant increase in the total duration of contacts (A), a significant increase in the mean duration per contact (B), a significant decrease in the number of contacts (C), a significant decrease in the total duration of active contacts (D), and a significant decrease in the distance traveled (E). Cdkl5 +/Y, n = 11 pairs; Cdkl5 -/Y, n = 11 pairs. Data indicate means ± SEM. (F-K) The three-chamber social interaction test. Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant decrease in the total distance traveled (F), and a tendency toward decrease in the average speed (G). (H) Time spent in each chamber (sec). Cdkl5 -/Y mice show a significant preference for the center chamber, whereas Cdkl5 +/Y mice spend significantly more time in other chambers. (I) Time spent around cage (sec). Cdkl5 +/Y mice sp..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 7,
"name": "Social interaction of Cdkl5 -/Y mice is uniquely altered",
"text": "Twenty-four hour monitoring in the home cage under familiar conditions was conducted for one week to analyze the interaction and circadian activities of Cdkl5 KO mice. Social interaction was measured by counting the number of \"particle\", which represents an image of each mouse (see ); two particles indicated that the mice were not in contact with each other, and one particle indicated contact between them. Cdkl5 -/Y mice spent significantly more time staying together compared to control mice during daytime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 75.79, p < 0.0001, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ), but not in the nighttime (mean number of particles F 1,20 = 1.444, p = 0.2436, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The genotype difference during the whole period was significant (F 1,20 = 14.166, p = 0.0012, two-way repeated measures ANOVA, ). The activity level of Cdkl5 -/Y mice w..."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 8,
"name": "Three-chamber social interaction test",
"text": "The three-chamber social interaction test was performed as previously described [ ]. The testing apparatus consisted of a rectangular, three-chambered box and a lid with an infrared video camera (O'hara & Co., Tokyo). Each chamber was 20 cm x 40 cm x 22 cm and the dividing walls were made of clear Plexiglas, with small square openings (5 x 3 cm) allowing access into each chamber. An unfamiliar C57BL/6 male (stranger 1), that had had no prior contact with the subject mouse, was placed in one of the side chambers. The location of stranger 1 in the left vs. right side chamber was systematically alternated between trials. The stranger mouse was enclosed in a small, round wire cage, which allowed nose contact between the bars, but prevented fighting. The cage was 11 cm in height, with a bottom diameter of 9 cm, vertical bars 0.5 cm, and horizontal bars spaced 1 cm apart. The subject..."
}
],
"tool": [],
"supply": [],
"isBasedOn": {
"@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"headline": "Comprehensive behavioral analysis of the Cdkl5 knockout mice revealed significant enhancement in anxiety- and fear-related behaviors and impairment in both acquisition and long-term retention of spatial reference memory",
"datePublished": "2018",
"author": [
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Kosuke Okuda"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Keizo Takao"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Aya Watanabe"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Tsuyoshi Miyakawa"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Masashi Mizuguchi"
},
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Teruyuki Tanaka"
}
],
"identifier": "10.1371/journal.pone.0196587"
}
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Experiments",
"item": "https://replicatescience.com/experiments"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Comprehensive behavioral analysis of the Cdkl5 knockout mice revealed significant enhancement in anxiety- and fear-related behaviors and impairment in both acquisition and long-term retention of spatial reference memory methods",
"item": "https://replicatescience.com/experiments/comprehensive-behavioral-analysis-of-the-cdkl5-knockout-mice-revealed-significant-enhancement-in-anxiety-and-fear-related-behaviors-and-impairment-in-both-acquisition-and-long-term/comprehensive-behavioral-analysis-of-the-cdkl5-knockout-mice-revealed-significant-enhancement-in-anx-mlph98bw"
}
]
}
]