Source Paper
The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells
RU Muller, JL Kubie
Journal of Neuroscience • 1987
Source Paper
RU Muller, JL Kubie
Journal of Neuroscience • 1987
Using the techniques set out in the preceding paper (Muller et al., 1987), we investigated the response of place cells to changes in the animal's environment. The standard apparatus used was a cylinder, 76 cm in diameter, with walls 51 cm high. The interior was uniformly gray except for a white cue card that ran the full height of the wall and occupied 100 degrees of arc. The floor of the apparatus presented no obstacles to the animal's motions. Each of these major features of the apparatus was varied while the others were held constant. One set of manipulations involved the cue card. Rotating the cue card produced equal rotations of the firing fields of single cells. Changing the width of the card did not affect the size, shape, or radial position of firing fields, although sometimes the field rotated to a modest extent. Removing the cue card altogether also left the size, shape, and radial positions of firing fields unchanged, but caused fields to rotate to unpredictable angular positions. The second set of manipulations dealt with the size and shape of the apparatus wall. When the standard (small) cylinder was scaled up in diameter and height by a factor of 2, the firing fields of 36% of the cells observed in both cylinders also scaled, in the sense that the field stayed at the same angular position and at the same relative radial position. Of the cells recorded in both cylinders, 52% showed very different firing patterns in one cylinder than in the other. The remaining 12% of the cells were virtually silent in both cylinders. Similar results were obtained when individual cells were recorded in both a small and a large rectangular enclosure. By contrast, when the apparatus floor plan was changed from circular to rectangular, the firing pattern of a cell in an apparatus of one shape could not be predicted from a knowledge of the firing pattern in the other shape. The final manipulations involved placing vertical barriers into the otherwise unobstructed floor of the small cylinder. When an opaque barrier was set up to bisect a previously recorded firing field, in almost all cases the firing field was nearly abolished. This was true even though the barrier occupied only a small fraction of the firing field area. A transparent barrier was effective as the opaque barrier in attenuating firing fields. The lead base used to anchor the vertical barriers did not affect place cell firing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Objective: To investigate the response of hippocampal place cells to changes in the environment, specifically testing how place cell firing fields respond to rotation of a visual cue card in a recording cylinder
This is a Cue Card Rotation Manipulation protocol using Not explicitly stated as the model organism. The procedure involves 10 procedural steps, 4 equipment items, 4 materials. Extracted from a 1987 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
Not explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated • unknown • Not explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Establish baseline place cell firing in standard cylinder • Rotate the cue card • Change the width of the cue card
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Record place cell activity from animals moving freely in the standard cylindrical apparatus with uniform gray walls and white cue card
Note: The white cue card occupies 100 degrees of arc and runs the full height of the wall. The floor presents no obstacles to animal motion
“The standard apparatus used was a cylinder, 76 cm in diameter, with walls 51 cm high. The interior was uniformly gray except for a white cue card that ran the full height of the wall and occupied 100 degrees of arc”
Rotate the white cue card while continuously recording place cell firing to measure how firing fields respond to cue rotation
Note: This is the primary manipulation for testing cue-dependent place cell responses
“Rotating the cue card produced equal rotations of the firing fields of single cells”
Modify the angular width of the white cue card while recording place cell activity to test whether cue size affects firing field properties
Note: Cue width changes do not affect firing field size, shape, or radial position, though modest field rotation may occur
“Changing the width of the card did not affect the size, shape, or radial position of firing fields, although sometimes the field rotated to a modest extent”
Completely remove the white cue card from the cylinder and record place cell firing to test the necessity of the visual cue
Note: Firing field size, shape, and radial positions remain unchanged but fields rotate to unpredictable angular positions
“Removing the cue card altogether also left the size, shape, and radial positions of firing fields unchanged, but caused fields to rotate to unpredictable angular positions”
Record place cell activity in a cylinder scaled up by a factor of 2 in both diameter and height to test size-dependent scaling of firing fields
Note: 36% of cells showed scaling with same angular and relative radial positions; 52% showed different patterns; 12% were silent in both cylinders
“When the standard (small) cylinder was scaled up in diameter and height by a factor of 2, the firing fields of 36% of the cells observed in both cylinders also scaled”
Record place cell activity in both small and large rectangular enclosures to test whether results from cylindrical scaling generalize to different apparatus shapes
Note: Similar scaling results were obtained in rectangular enclosures as in cylindrical ones
“Similar results were obtained when individual cells were recorded in both a small and a large rectangular enclosure”
Record place cell activity in a rectangular apparatus after establishing baseline in the circular cylinder to test shape-dependent changes in firing patterns
Note: Firing patterns in one shape cannot be predicted from knowledge of patterns in the other shape
“When the apparatus floor plan was changed from circular to rectangular, the firing pattern of a cell in an apparatus of one shape could not be predicted from a knowledge of the firing pattern in the other shape”
Set up an opaque vertical barrier to bisect a previously recorded firing field while recording place cell activity
Note: Barrier occupies only a small fraction of the firing field area but nearly abolishes the field in almost all cases
“When an opaque barrier was set up to bisect a previously recorded firing field, in almost all cases the firing field was nearly abolished. This was true even though the barrier occupied only a small fraction of the firing field area”
Set up a transparent vertical barrier to bisect a previously recorded firing field while recording place cell activity to test whether visual properties of the barrier matter
Note: Transparent barrier is as effective as opaque barrier in attenuating firing fields, suggesting physical rather than visual properties are critical
“A transparent barrier was effective as the opaque barrier in attenuating firing fields”
Verify that the lead base used to anchor barriers does not independently affect place cell firing
Note: Control condition to ensure barrier effects are not due to the anchoring mechanism
“The lead base used to anchor the vertical barriers did not affect place cell firing”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
To investigate the response of hippocampal place cells to changes in the environment, specifically testing how place cell firing fields respond to rotation of a visual cue card in a recording cylinder
Objective
To investigate the response of hippocampal place cells to changes in the environment, specifically testing how place cell firing fields respond to rotation of a visual cue card in a recording cylinder
Subjects
From paperNot explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated • unknown • Not explicitly stated • Not explicitly stated
Cohort notes
From paperAnimals were recorded while moving in the apparatus
Establish baseline place cell firing in standard cylinder (Not specified)
Rotate the cue card (Not specified)
Change the width of the cue card (Not specified)
Remove the cue card (Not specified)
Rotation angle of place cell firing fields in response to cue card rotation
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Size of firing fields
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Shape of firing fields
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Radial position of firing fields
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Rotation angle of place cell firing fields in response to cue card rotation
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Size of firing fields
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Shape of firing fields
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Radial position of firing fields
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not explicitly described in the provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Rotation angle of place cell firing fields in response to cue card rotation; Size of firing fields; Shape of firing fields; Radial position of firing fields.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Rotation angle of place cell firing fields in response to cue card rotation, Size of firing fields, Shape of firing fields, Radial position of firing fields.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
RU Muller et al. (1987). The effects of changes in the environment on the spatial firing of hippocampal complex-spike cells. Journal of Neuroscience
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not explicitly mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not explicitly mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not explicitly mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not explicitly mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
10
Evidence Quotes
18
Protocol Items
8
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
10
Evidence
18
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work
Fornix Transection
Probe Test
Cocaine-Induced Reinstatement Testing
Vertical Barrier Obstruction Study