Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally methods
Aim. Evidence-backed execution summary for Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally methods from Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.
Show snapshot details
On this page
This experiment, in seven questions
Jump straight to the part of the recipe you need. Data and provenance labels stay close to the action they support.
Shopping and prep list
What do I need before I start?
human
Subject model for the experiment.
- Use
- confirm full cohort details in the source paper
Total volume of glyphosate applied
NASS use data were downloaded and integrated into the "Pesticide Use Data System" (PUDS). Additional file: Tables S6-S15 [ ] report glyphosate use in the U.S. on grain crops, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and other crops for 1982, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, and every 2 years thereafter through...
- Use
- NASS use data were downloaded and integrated into the "Pesticide Use Data System" (PUDS). Additional file: Tables S6-S15 [ ] report glyphosate use in the U.S. on grain crops, fruits, vegetables, nuts, and other crops for 1982, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004, and every 2 years thereafter through...
Before you run
What should be confirmed before execution?
First confirmation
Equipment is listed but no product mappings are linked.
Confirm before execution
This page is backed by a publishable Replication Data Ledger package with zero critical source-verification issues.
Confirm before execution
Open the source paper before finalizing run-specific details.
Procurement checkpoint
Use source-stated vendors where present. Treat mapped products as sourcing options unless the page marks an exact source match.
Open quote workflowStep-by-step procedure
What do I do, in order?
U.S. data sources
In each year, NASS strives to collect data on states that collectively account for at least 85 % of the area planted nationally to a given crop. For some crops, 15 or more states are surveyed to reach this threshold, while in other crops only two states are required (e.g., lemons in 2011, two states; corn in 2010, 21 states). Accordingly, when NASS reports national estimates of total pesticide use on surveyed acres of a given crop, the data typically underestimate total national crop use by ~15 %, since national acres planted always exceeds NASS acres surveyed. This is why in several Additional file: Tables [ ] the pounds of herbicides applied are reported on both NASS-surveyed acres and total national acre. To estimate use on all planted hectares/acres, the average rate of application per crop year on NASS-surveyed acres is applied to the total planted area [ ].
Global use of glyphosate
Glyphosate was, of course, not applied evenly on every hectare of cropland. The average rate of glyphosate applications per hectare per crop year during 2014 fell in the range of 1.5-2.0 kg/hectare [ ]. At these rates of application, the total volume of glyphosate applied in 2014 was sufficient to treat between 22 and 30 % of globally cultivated cropland. No pesticide in history has been sprayed so widely.
Relative toxicity and impacts
For years, glyphosate has been regarded as among the least chronically toxic herbicides for mammals, and indeed only three EPA-registered synthetic pesticides in current agricultural use have a higher chronic Reference Dose (the imidazolinone herbicides imazamox, imazethapyr, and imazapyr).
Relative toxicity and impacts
For human exposures, the U.S. EPA has set glyphosate's daily chronic Reference Dose (cRfD) at 1.75 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight (mg/kg bodyweight/day). The EU-set cRfD for glyphosate was recently raised from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg/day, 3.5-fold lower than EPA's. A team of scientists has compiled evidence supporting the need for a fivefold reduction in the EU cRfD to 0.1 mg/kg/day [ ], a level 17-times lower than EPA's.
Relative toxicity and impacts
Glyphosate is a moderate dose herbicide with relatively low acute and chronic mammalian toxicity, to the extent mammalian risk is accurately reflected in required EPA toxicology studies. After an exhaustive review, however, glyphosate was classified in 2015 as a "probable human carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [ ], based on increased prevalence of rare liver and kidney tumors in chronic animal feeding studies, epidemiological studies reporting positive associations with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and strong mechanistic evidence of genotoxicity and ability to trigger oxidative stress [ ].
Acknowledgements
The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie Knoke compiled the glyphosate use dataset and produced the figures. Nicholas Potter helped develop the tables and refine the analysis. Reviewers provided helpful suggestions for improvement. Also, thanks to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) for compiling and making available information on pesticide use in the U.S., and to the EPA for its helpful periodic reports on pesticide use.
Measurement outputs
What raw and processed outputs should exist?
Global glyphosate use data sources and estimates. A special issue of the journal Pest Management Science in 2000 focused on glyphosate uses, issues, and challenges. Woodburn [ ]...
- Raw artifact
- Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
- Processed artifact
- Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
- Reported as
- Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie...
- Raw artifact
- Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
- Processed artifact
- Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
- Reported as
- Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Analysis plan
How should the outputs become interpretable results?
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
inferred from protocolPreprocessing / cleaning
Glyphosate is applied in a variety of forms including isopropylamine salt, ammonium salt, diammonium salt, dimethylammonium salt, and potassium salt [ ].
from paperScoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Global glyphosate use data sources and estimates. A special issue of the journal Pest Management Science in 2000 focused on glyphosate uses, issues, and challenges. Woodburn [ ]...; The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie....
from paperStatistical comparison
Glyphosate is applied in a variety of forms including isopropylamine salt, ammonium salt, diammonium salt, dimethylammonium salt, and potassium salt [ ]. E.g., in its corn pesti...; The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), through the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), has collected reasonably comprehensive pesticide use data for major grain...; National Agriculture Statistical Service. See Additional file: Table S17 for details; The development and marketing of GE, Roundup Ready crops fundamentally changed how crop farmers could apply glyphosate. Before RR technology, farmers could spray glyphosate prio...
from paperReporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Global glyphosate use data sources and estimates. A special issue of the journal Pest Management Science in 2000 focused on glyphosate uses, issues, and challenges. Woodburn [ ]..., The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie....
inferred from protocolStructured statistical methods
Glyphosate is applied in a variety of forms including isopropylamine salt, ammonium salt, diammonium salt, dimethylammonium salt, and potassium salt [ ]. E.g., in its corn pesti...; The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), through the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), has collected reasonably comprehensive pesticide use data for major grain...; National Agriculture Statistical Service. See Additional file: Table S17 for details; The development and marketing of GE, Roundup Ready crops fundamentally changed how crop farmers could apply glyphosate. Before RR technology, farmers could spray glyphosate prio...
source structuredSource and audit
What supports the facts on this page?
Evidence quotes (6)
In each year, NASS strives to collect data on states that collectively account for at least 85 % of the area planted nationally to a given crop. For some crops, 15 or more states are surveyed to reach this threshold, while in other crops only two states are required (e.g., lemons in 2011, two states; corn in 2010, 21 states). Accordingly, when NASS reports national estimates of total pesticide use on surveyed acres of a given crop, the data typically underestimate total national crop use by ~15 %, since national acres planted always exceeds NASS acres surveyed. This is why in several Additional file: Tables [ ] the pounds of herbicides applied are reported on both NASS-surveyed acres and total national acre. To estimate use on all planted hectares/acres, the average rate of application per crop year on NASS-surveyed acres is applied to the total planted area [ ].
Glyphosate was, of course, not applied evenly on every hectare of cropland. The average rate of glyphosate applications per hectare per crop year during 2014 fell in the range of 1.5-2.0 kg/hectare [ ]. At these rates of application, the total volume of glyphosate applied in 2014 was sufficient to treat between 22 and 30 % of globally cultivated cropland. No pesticide in history has been sprayed so widely.
For years, glyphosate has been regarded as among the least chronically toxic herbicides for mammals, and indeed only three EPA-registered synthetic pesticides in current agricultural use have a higher chronic Reference Dose (the imidazolinone herbicides imazamox, imazethapyr, and imazapyr).
For human exposures, the U.S. EPA has set glyphosate's daily chronic Reference Dose (cRfD) at 1.75 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight (mg/kg bodyweight/day). The EU-set cRfD for glyphosate was recently raised from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg/day, 3.5-fold lower than EPA's. A team of scientists has compiled evidence supporting the need for a fivefold reduction in the EU cRfD to 0.1 mg/kg/day [ ], a level 17-times lower than EPA's.
Glyphosate is a moderate dose herbicide with relatively low acute and chronic mammalian toxicity, to the extent mammalian risk is accurately reflected in required EPA toxicology studies. After an exhaustive review, however, glyphosate was classified in 2015 as a "probable human carcinogen" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [ ], based on increased prevalence of rare liver and kidney tumors in chronic animal feeding studies, epidemiological studies reporting positive associations with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and strong mechanistic evidence of genotoxicity and ability to trigger oxidative stress [ ].
The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie Knoke compiled the glyphosate use dataset and produced the figures. Nicholas Potter helped develop the tables and refine the analysis. Reviewers provided helpful suggestions for improvement. Also, thanks to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) for compiling and making available information on pesticide use in the U.S., and to the EPA for its helpful periodic reports on pesticide use.
Machine-readable layer
[
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally methods",
"description": "Evidence-backed execution summary for Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally methods from Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally.",
"step": [
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 1,
"name": "U.S. data sources",
"text": "In each year, NASS strives to collect data on states that collectively account for at least 85 % of the area planted nationally to a given crop. For some crops, 15 or more states are surveyed to reach this threshold, while in other crops only two states are required (e.g., lemons in 2011, two states; corn in 2010, 21 states). Accordingly, when NASS reports national estimates of total pesticide use on surveyed acres of a given crop, the data typically underestimate total national crop use by ~15 %, since national acres planted always exceeds NASS acres surveyed. This is why in several Additional file: Tables [ ] the pounds of herbicides applied are reported on both NASS-surveyed acres and total national acre. To estimate use on all planted hectares/acres, the average rate of application per crop year on NASS-surveyed acres is applied to the total planted area [ ]."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 2,
"name": "Global use of glyphosate",
"text": "Glyphosate was, of course, not applied evenly on every hectare of cropland. The average rate of glyphosate applications per hectare per crop year during 2014 fell in the range of 1.5-2.0 kg/hectare [ ]. At these rates of application, the total volume of glyphosate applied in 2014 was sufficient to treat between 22 and 30 % of globally cultivated cropland. No pesticide in history has been sprayed so widely."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 3,
"name": "Relative toxicity and impacts",
"text": "For years, glyphosate has been regarded as among the least chronically toxic herbicides for mammals, and indeed only three EPA-registered synthetic pesticides in current agricultural use have a higher chronic Reference Dose (the imidazolinone herbicides imazamox, imazethapyr, and imazapyr)."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 4,
"name": "Relative toxicity and impacts",
"text": "For human exposures, the U.S. EPA has set glyphosate's daily chronic Reference Dose (cRfD) at 1.75 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight (mg/kg bodyweight/day). The EU-set cRfD for glyphosate was recently raised from 0.3 to 0.5 mg/kg/day, 3.5-fold lower than EPA's. A team of scientists has compiled evidence supporting the need for a fivefold reduction in the EU cRfD to 0.1 mg/kg/day [ ], a level 17-times lower than EPA's."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 5,
"name": "Relative toxicity and impacts",
"text": "Glyphosate is a moderate dose herbicide with relatively low acute and chronic mammalian toxicity, to the extent mammalian risk is accurately reflected in required EPA toxicology studies. After an exhaustive review, however, glyphosate was classified in 2015 as a \"probable human carcinogen\" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [ ], based on increased prevalence of rare liver and kidney tumors in chronic animal feeding studies, epidemiological studies reporting positive associations with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and strong mechanistic evidence of genotoxicity and ability to trigger oxidative stress [ ]."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 6,
"name": "Acknowledgements",
"text": "The author thanks his colleagues at Washington State University's Measure to Manage Program for assistance in developing the datasets and carrying out the analysis. Karie Knoke compiled the glyphosate use dataset and produced the figures. Nicholas Potter helped develop the tables and refine the analysis. Reviewers provided helpful suggestions for improvement. Also, thanks to the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) for compiling and making available information on pesticide use in the U.S., and to the EPA for its helpful periodic reports on pesticide use."
}
],
"tool": [
{
"@type": "HowToTool",
"name": "Total volume of glyphosate applied"
}
],
"supply": [],
"isBasedOn": {
"@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
"headline": "Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally",
"datePublished": "2016",
"author": [
{
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Charles M. Benbrook"
}
],
"identifier": "10.1186/s12302-016-0070-0"
}
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Experiments",
"item": "https://replicatescience.com/experiments"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally methods",
"item": "https://replicatescience.com/experiments/trends-in-glyphosate-herbicide-use-in-the-united-states-and-globally-methods-charles-m-benbrook-pmc5044953/trends-in-glyphosate-herbicide-use-in-the-united-states-and-globally-mlpgvu6g"
}
]
}
]