Aversive Stimulus Modality Comparison
Objective: To determine which aversive stimulus modalities (electric shock, heated floor, intense noise, cooled floor) elicit fighting responses between paired rats and to characterize the reflexive nature of this fighting behavior
This is a Aversive Stimulus Modality Comparison protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 7 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 4 materials. Extracted from a 1962 paper published in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • both • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Pair rats in enclosed chamber • Apply electric shock stimulus • Apply heated floor stimulus
Primary readouts
- Presence or absence of fighting behavior
- Frequency of fighting responses
- Consistency of fighting elicitation across stimulus modalities
- Effect of enclosed floor area on fighting elicitation
Key equipment and reagents
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
- Verify the animal model, intervention setup, and collection timepoints against the source paper.
- Check that every direct vendor link matches the exact specification your lab plans to run.
Use the page like this
- Work through the protocol steps in order and use the inline vendor chips only when you need to source or verify an item.
- Jump to Experimental Context for readouts, data shape, and analysis flow before planning downstream analysis.
Protocol Steps
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Pair rats in enclosed chamber
Place two rats together in an enclosed chamber with controlled floor area
Note: Chamber size affects fighting elicitation
View evidence from paper
“Elicitation of fighting was a direct function of the enclosed floor area and a nonmonotonic function of the shock intensity”
Apply electric shock stimulus
Deliver electric shock through electrified grid floor to paired rats
Note: Polarity of electrified grid must be scrambled for consistent fighting. Failure to scramble produced inconsistent fighting
View evidence from paper
“Failure to scramble the polarity of the electrified grid produced inconsistent fighting”
Apply heated floor stimulus
Deliver thermal aversive stimulus via heated floor to paired rats
Note: Heated floor elicited fighting between rats
View evidence from paper
“Electrode shock and a heated floor elicited fighting between the rats, but intense noise and a cooled floor did not”
Apply intense noise stimulus
Expose paired rats to intense noise as aversive stimulus
Note: Intense noise did NOT elicit fighting
View evidence from paper
“Electrode shock and a heated floor elicited fighting between the rats, but intense noise and a cooled floor did not”
Apply cooled floor stimulus
Deliver cold aversive stimulus via cooled floor to paired rats
Note: Cooled floor did NOT elicit fighting
View evidence from paper
“Electrode shock and a heated floor elicited fighting between the rats, but intense noise and a cooled floor did not”
Observe and record fighting behavior
Monitor paired rats for fighting responses during aversive stimulus presentation
Note: Fighting is fairly stereotyped and easily differentiated from rats' usual behavior
View evidence from paper
“Reflexive fighting was elicited between paired rats as a reflex reaction to electric shock prior to any specific conditioning. Such fighting was fairly stereotyped and easily differentiated from the rats' usual behavior”
Repeat shock presentations
Present repeated electric shock stimuli to assess habituation
Note: Repeated shock presentations did not produce appreciable decrease in fighting until signs of physical debility appeared
View evidence from paper
“Repeated shock presentations did not produce an appreciable decrease in fighting until signs of physical debility appeared”