Source Paper
Source Paper
Antonio W. Zuardi, Natália P. Rodrigues, Angélica L. Silva, Sandra A. Bernardo, Jaime E. C. Hallak et al.
Frontiers in Pharmacology • 2017
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the anxiolytic effect of cannabidiol (CBD) in humans follows the same pattern of an inverted U-shaped dose-effect curve observed in many animal studies. Sixty healthy subjects of both sexes aged between 18 and 35 years were randomly assigned to five groups that received placebo, clonazepam (1 mg), and CBD (100, 300, and 900 mg). The subjects were underwent a test of public speaking in a real situation (TPSRS) where each subject had to speak in front of a group formed by the remaining participants. Each subject completed the anxiety and sedation factors of the Visual Analog Mood Scale and had their blood pressure and heart rate recorded. These measures were obtained in five experimental sessions with 12 volunteers each. Each session had four steps at the following times (minutes) after administration of the drug/placebo, as time 0: -5 (baseline), 80 (pre-test), 153 (speech), and 216 (post-speech). Repeated-measures analyses of variance showed that the TPSRS increased the subjective measures of anxiety, heart rate, and blood pressure. Student-Newman-Keuls test comparisons among the groups in each phase showed significant attenuation in anxiety scores relative to the placebo group in the group treated with clonazepam during the speech phase, and in the clonazepam and CBD 300 mg groups in the post-speech phase. Clonazepam was more sedative than CBD 300 and 900 mg and induced a smaller increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure than CBD 300 mg. The results confirmed that the acute administration of CBD induced anxiolytic effects with a dose-dependent inverted U-shaped curve in healthy subjects, since the subjective anxiety measures were reduced with CBD 300 mg, but not with CBD 100 and 900 mg, in the post-speech phase.
Objective: Evaluate the effects of different doses of CBD (100, 300, 900 mg), clonazepam (1 mg), or placebo on anxiety and related behavioral measures in healthy human subjects using a double-blind, randomized design
This is a CBD and Clonazepam Dose-Response Study protocol using human as the model organism. The procedure involves 6 procedural steps, 3 materials. Extracted from a 2017 paper published in Frontiers in Pharmacology.
Model and subjects
human • not applicable • both • 18-35 years • not specified • 59
Study window
~1 week study window | ~48 hours hands-on
Core workflow
Subject Recruitment and Screening • Anxiety Assessment Interview • Informed Consent
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Sixty healthy men and women aged 18-35 years were recruited through advertisement at the University of São Paulo campus in Ribeirão Preto. Participants were screened for eligibility based on absence of psychiatric illness, alcohol or drug dependence, and major medical conditions.
Note: Participants taking medications with potential to interfere with study results were excluded
“Sixty healthy men and women aged 18–35 years, with no history of past or current psychiatric illness, alcohol or other drug dependence were recruited through advertisement”
Eligible volunteers were interviewed to assess eligibility and measure their propensity to anxiety using the trait version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Note: STAI-trait score was used for group matching
“The volunteers were interviewed in order to assess eligibility and to measure their propensity to anxiety through the trait version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory”
Eligible participants who agreed to participate gave written informed consent after being fully informed of research procedures. Study conformed to Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Ethics Committee of Ribeirão Preto Medical School University Hospital.
Note: Ethics approval number: HCRP - No. 12407/09
“All volunteers gave written informed consent to participate after being fully informed of the research procedures, which conformed to the current terms of the Declaration of Helsinki”
Volunteers were instructed to abstain from drugs in the week prior to tests and from alcohol and caffeine in the 24 hours before the test.
Note: Compliance with abstinence instructions was critical for study validity
“The volunteers were instructed to abstain from drugs in the week prior to the tests and from alcohol and caffeine in the 24 h before the test”
Eligible participants were randomly allocated to five groups with 12 subjects each to receive different doses of CBD (100, 300, and 900 mg), clonazepam (1 mg), or placebo in a double-blind, randomized design.
Note: Groups were matched according to gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and STAI-trait score
“The volunteers were randomly allocated to five groups with 12 subjects each to receive different doses of CBD (100, 300, and 900 mg), clonazepam (1 mg) or placebo in a double-blind, randomized design”
Subjects attended the experimental session to receive their assigned treatment (CBD dose, clonazepam, or placebo) and undergo behavioral testing.
Note: One volunteer from CBD-300 group could not attend and was withdrawn from the study
“One volunteer from the CBD-300 group could not attend the experimental session due to personal issues and was withdrawn from the study”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Evaluate the effects of different doses of CBD (100, 300, 900 mg), clonazepam (1 mg), or placebo on anxiety and related behavioral measures in healthy human subjects using a double-blind, randomized design
Objective
Evaluate the effects of different doses of CBD (100, 300, 900 mg), clonazepam (1 mg), or placebo on anxiety and related behavioral measures in healthy human subjects using a double-blind, randomized design
Subjects
From paperhuman • not applicable • both • 18-35 years • not specified
Sample count
From paper59
Cohort notes
From paperHealthy men and women with no history of past or current psychiatric illness, alcohol or other drug dependence.
Subject Recruitment and Screening (not specified)
Anxiety Assessment Interview (not specified)
Informed Consent (not specified)
Pre-Test Abstinence Instructions (1 week for drugs; 24 hours for alcohol and caffeine)
Anxiety levels measured by Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
From papernot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Anxiety levels measured by Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
not specified in provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Anxiety levels measured by Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Anxiety levels measured by Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Antonio W. Zuardi et al. (2017). Inverted U-Shaped Dose-Response Curve of the Anxiolytic Effect of Cannabidiol during Public Speaking in Real Life. Frontiers in Pharmacology
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
not specified • not applicable • not specified • not mentioned
not specified • not applicable • not specified • not mentioned
not specified • not applicable • not specified • not mentioned
not specified • not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
6
Evidence Quotes
9
Protocol Items
3
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
6
Evidence
9
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work
Music Experience Rating Scale
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Semi-structured Interviews on Music Experience in Psilocybin Therapy
Nicotine Patch Challenge Study