Source Paper
Brian A. Horger, Christiana A. Iyasere, Melissa T. Berhow, Chad J. Messer, Eric J. Nestler et al.
Journal of Neuroscience • 1999
The mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system has been implicated in drug reward, locomotor sensitization, and responding for reward-related stimuli [termed conditioned reinforcers (CR)]. Here, we investigated the effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which enhances the survival and function of dopaminergic neurons, on stimulant-induced locomotor sensitization and responding for CR. In experiment 1, BDNF was infused into the nucleus accumbens (NAc) or ventral tegmental area over 2 weeks via chronically implanted minipumps (1–2.5 µg/d), and the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (5–15 mg/kg, i.p.) were studied. We found that BDNF enhanced the initial stimulant effects of cocaine and seemed to facilitate the development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses. In experiment 2, we studied the effects of intra-NAc BDNF infusions on responding for CR. BDNF-treated rats showed twice as many CR responses compared with controls when saline was first administered. BDNF enhanced responding on the CR lever more than four times that seen in control animals after a cocaine injection (10 mg/kg, i.p.). The enhanced response to cocaine in BDNF-treated animals persisted for more than a month after the BDNF infusions had stopped, indicating long-lasting changes in the mesolimbic DA system caused by BDNF administration. In experiment 3, we examined locomotor sensitization to cocaine in heterozygous BDNF knock-out mice and found that the development of sensitization was delayed compared with wild-type littermates. These results demonstrate the profound effects of BDNF on the enhancement of both cocaine-induced locomotion and facilitation of CR and suggest a possible role for BDNF in long-term adaptations of the brain to cocaine.
Objective: To investigate the effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) infusions into the nucleus accumbens on cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization and responding for conditioned reinforcers, with and without cocaine administration
This is a Conditioned Reward Response with BDNF protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 6 procedural steps, 3 equipment items, 3 materials. Extracted from a 1999 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
~2 week study window
Core workflow
Surgical implantation of minipumps • Experiment 1: Cocaine administration and locomotor activity measurement • Experiment 2: Conditioned reinforcer responding with saline
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Chronically implanted minipumps were surgically placed to deliver BDNF into the nucleus accumbens or ventral tegmental area
Note: BDNF dose: 1-2.5 µg/d
“BDNF was infused into the nucleus accumbens (NAc) or ventral tegmental area over 2 weeks via chronically implanted minipumps (1–2.5 µg/d)”
Cocaine was administered via intraperitoneal injection at doses of 5-15 mg/kg to BDNF-treated and control animals, and psychomotor stimulant effects were measured
Note: BDNF enhanced initial stimulant effects and facilitated development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses
“the psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (5–15 mg/kg, i.p.) were studied. We found that BDNF enhanced the initial stimulant effects of cocaine and seemed to facilitate the development of sensitization”
Saline was first administered and responding on the conditioned reinforcer lever was measured in BDNF-treated and control rats
Note: BDNF-treated rats showed twice as many CR responses compared with controls
“BDNF-treated rats showed twice as many CR responses compared with controls when saline was first administered”
Cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered and responding on the conditioned reinforcer lever was measured in BDNF-treated and control rats
Note: BDNF enhanced responding on CR lever more than four times that seen in control animals
“BDNF enhanced responding on the CR lever more than four times that seen in control animals after a cocaine injection (10 mg/kg, i.p.)”
Conditioned reinforcer responding was measured for more than a month after BDNF infusions had stopped
Note: Enhanced response to cocaine in BDNF-treated animals persisted, indicating long-lasting changes
“The enhanced response to cocaine in BDNF-treated animals persisted for more than a month after the BDNF infusions had stopped”
Locomotor sensitization to cocaine was examined in heterozygous BDNF knock-out mice and compared with wild-type littermates
Note: Development of sensitization was delayed in BDNF knock-out mice compared with wild-type littermates
“In experiment 3, we examined locomotor sensitization to cocaine in heterozygous BDNF knock-out mice and found that the development of sensitization was delayed compared with wild-type littermates”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
To investigate the effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) infusions into the nucleus accumbens on cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization and responding for conditioned reinforcers, with and without cocaine administration
Objective
To investigate the effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) infusions into the nucleus accumbens on cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization and responding for conditioned reinforcers, with and without cocaine administration
Subjects
From paperrat • Not specified • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperExperiment 3 also used heterozygous BDNF knock-out mice and wild-type littermates
Surgical implantation of minipumps (2 weeks of continuous infusion)
Experiment 1: Cocaine administration and locomotor activity measurement (Not specified)
Experiment 2: Conditioned reinforcer responding with saline (Not specified)
Experiment 2: Conditioned reinforcer responding with cocaine (Not specified)
Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (locomotor activity)
From paperNot specified in the provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses
From paperNot specified in the provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Number of conditioned reinforcer (CR) responses
From paperNot specified in the provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Responding on CR lever after saline administration
From paperNot specified in the provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (locomotor activity)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Number of conditioned reinforcer (CR) responses
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Responding on CR lever after saline administration
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in the provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (locomotor activity); Development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses; Number of conditioned reinforcer (CR) responses; Responding on CR lever after saline administration.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Psychomotor stimulant effects of cocaine (locomotor activity), Development of sensitization to repeated cocaine doses, Number of conditioned reinforcer (CR) responses, Responding on CR lever after saline administration.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Brian A. Horger et al. (1999). Enhancement of Locomotor Activity and Conditioned Reward to Cocaine by Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Journal of Neuroscience
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
6
Evidence Quotes
12
Protocol Items
6
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
6
Evidence
12
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work