Objective: Testing conditioned responding to a visual stimulus following devaluation of the associated reinforcer to assess sensitivity to changes in incentive value
Materials & Equipment Checklist
6 items1 from ConductScience
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Equipment4
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Product links help support this free resource.
Protocol Steps
View Abstract
Clinical evidence indicates that damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex disrupts goal-directed actions that are guided by motivational and emotional factors. As a consequence, patients with such damage characteristically engage in maladaptive behaviors. Other research has shown that neurons in the corresponding orbital region of prefrontal cortex in laboratory animals encode information regarding the incentive properties of goals or expected events. The present study investigates the effect of neurotoxic orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) lesions in the rat on responses that are normally influenced by associations between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and the incentive value of reinforcement. Rats were first trained to associate a visual CS with delivery of food pellets to a food cup. As a consequence of learning, rats approached the food cup during the CS in anticipation of reinforcement. In a second training phase, injection of LiCl followed consumption of the food unconditioned stimulus (US) in the home cage, a procedure used to alter the incentive value of the US. Subsequently, rats were returned to the conditioning chamber, and their responding to the CS in the absence of the food US was tested. Lesions of OFC did not affect either the initial acquisition of a conditioned response to the light CS in the first training phase or taste aversion learning in the second training phase. In the test for devaluation, however, OFC rats exhibited no change in conditioned responding to the visual CS. This outcome contrasts with the behavior of control rats; after devaluation of the US a significant decrease occurred in approach to the food cup during presentation of the CS. The results reveal an inability of a cue to access representational information about the incentive value of associated reinforcement after OFC damage.
1
Initial Conditioned Response Acquisition
Rats were trained to associate a visual conditioned stimulus (light) with delivery of food pellets to a food cup. As a consequence of learning, rats approached the food cup during the CS in anticipation of reinforcement.
Not specifiedNot specified
Note: This is the first training phase establishing the CS-US association
View evidence from paper
“Rats were first trained to associate a visual CS with delivery of food pellets to a food cup. As a consequence of learning, rats approached the food cup during the CS in anticipation of reinforcement”
2
Taste Aversion Learning (US Devaluation)
Injection of lithium chloride (LiCl) was administered following consumption of the food unconditioned stimulus in the home cage. This procedure was used to alter the incentive value of the US by creating a taste aversion.
Note: This is the second training phase that devalues the food reinforcer
View evidence from paper
“injection of LiCl followed consumption of the food unconditioned stimulus (US) in the home cage, a procedure used to alter the incentive value of the US”
3
Devaluation Test
Rats were returned to the conditioning chamber and their responding to the visual CS was tested in the absence of the food US. Approach behavior to the food cup during CS presentation was measured to assess sensitivity to the devaluation of the reinforcer.
Not specifiedNot specified
Note: This test measures whether conditioned responding is sensitive to changes in incentive value of the reinforcer
View evidence from paper
“Subsequently, rats were returned to the conditioning chamber, and their responding to the CS in the absence of the food US was tested”
