Source Paper
Facilitation of Conditioned Fear Extinction by Systemic Administration or Intra-Amygdala Infusions of d-Cycloserine as Assessed with Fear-Potentiated Startle in Rats
David L. Walker, Kerry J. Ressler, Kwok-Tung Lu, Michael Davis
Journal of Neuroscience • 2002
Fear-Potentiated Startle
Objective: Measurement of increased startle response in the presence versus absence of a conditioned light stimulus to assess fear levels and evaluate effects of d-cycloserine on fear extinction
This is a Fear-Potentiated Startle protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 8 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 4 materials. Extracted from a 2002 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Fear Conditioning • Baseline Fear-Potentiated Startle Measurement • Extinction Training - Variable Presentations
Primary readouts
- Fear-potentiated startle response (increased startle in presence vs absence of conditioned light stimulus)
- Extinction of conditioned fear across different numbers of non-reinforced light presentations
- Dose-dependent effects of DCS on fear extinction
- Blocking of DCS effects by HA-966
Key equipment and reagents
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
- Verify the animal model, intervention setup, and collection timepoints against the source paper.
- Check that every direct vendor link matches the exact specification your lab plans to run.
Use the page like this
- Work through the protocol steps in order and use the inline vendor chips only when you need to source or verify an item.
- Jump to Experimental Context for readouts, data shape, and analysis flow before planning downstream analysis.
Protocol Steps
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Fear Conditioning
Rats received fear conditioning with paired presentations of light and footshock
Note: Light stimulus was 3.7 seconds, footshock was 0.4 mA
View evidence from paper
“Rats received 10 pairings of a 3.7 sec light and a 0.4 mA footshock (fear conditioning)”
Baseline Fear-Potentiated Startle Measurement
Fear-potentiated startle was measured before extinction training to establish baseline fear levels
Note: Measured as increased startle in presence versus absence of light
View evidence from paper
“Fear-potentiated startle (increased startle in the presence vs the absence of the light) was subsequently measured before and after”
Extinction Training - Variable Presentations
Rats received non-reinforced light presentations without shock to extinguish conditioned fear response
Note: Different groups received different numbers of extinction presentations
View evidence from paper
“30, 60, or 90 presentations of the light without shock (extinction training)”
Post-Extinction Fear-Potentiated Startle Measurement
Fear-potentiated startle was measured after extinction training to assess extinction effectiveness
Note: Compared to baseline measurements
View evidence from paper
“Fear-potentiated startle (increased startle in the presence vs the absence of the light) was subsequently measured before and after”
DCS Administration - Systemic Injection
d-cycloserine was injected systemically before extinction training at varying doses
Note: Three dose levels tested: 3.25, 15, or 30 mg/kg. DCS dose-dependently enhanced extinction
View evidence from paper
“DCS injections (3.25, 15, or 30 mg/kg) before 30 non-reinforced light exposures dose-dependently enhanced extinction”
HA-966 Administration - Blocking Experiment
HA-966 (glycine-recognition site antagonist) was administered to block DCS effects
Note: Used to verify that DCS effects were mediated through glycine-recognition site
View evidence from paper
“These effects were blocked by HA-966, an antagonist at the glycine-recognition site”
DCS Administration Before Testing
DCS was injected before fear-potentiated startle testing to determine if it affects startle measurement itself
Note: DCS did not alter fear-potentiated startle when injected before testing
View evidence from paper
“Neither DCS nor HA-966 altered fear-potentiated startle when injected before testing”
Intra-Amygdala DCS Infusion
d-cycloserine was infused directly into the amygdala to test local effects on fear extinction
Note: 10 µg/side infused; effects mimicked systemic administration
View evidence from paper
“The effect of systemic administration was mimicked by intra-amygdala DCS (10 µg/side) infusions”