Source Paper
Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis
JS Taube, RU Muller, JB Ranck
Journal of Neuroscience • 1990
Source Paper
JS Taube, RU Muller, JB Ranck
Journal of Neuroscience • 1990
This paper is a study of the behavioral and spatial firing correlates of neurons in the rat postsubiculum. Recordings were made from postsubicular neurons as rats moved freely throughout a cylindrical chamber, where the major cue for orientation was a white card taped to the inside wall. An automatic video/computer system monitored cell discharge while simultaneously tracking the position of 2 colored light emitting diodes (LEDs) secured to the animal's head. The animal's location was calculated from the position of one of the LEDs and head direction in the horizontal plane calculated from the relative positions of the 2 LEDs. Approximately 26% of the cells were classified as head-direction cells because they discharged as a function of the animal's head direction in the horizontal plane, independent of the animal's behavior, location, or trunk position. For each head-direction cell, vectors drawn in the direction of maximal firing were parallel throughout the recording chamber and did not converge toward a single point. Plots of firing rate versus head direction showed that each firing-rate/head-direction function was adequately described by a triangular function. Each cell's maximum firing rate occurred at only one (the preferred) head direction; firing rates at head directions on either side of the preferred direction decreased linearly with angular deviation from the preferred direction. Results from 24 head-direction cells in 7 animals showed an equal distribution of preferred firing directions over a 360 degrees angle. The peak firing rate of head- direction cells varied from 5 to 115 spikes/sec (mean: 35). The range of head-direction angles over which discharge was elevated (directional firing range) was usually about 90 degrees, with little, if any, discharge at head directions outside this range. Quantitative analysis showed the location of the animal within the cylinder had minimal effect on directional cell firing. For each head-direction cell, the preferred direction, peak firing rate, and directional firing range remained stable for days. These results identify a new cell type that signals the animal's head direction in its environment.
Objective: Quantitative analysis of head-direction cell firing patterns in relation to the animal's head direction, location, and behavior in a cylindrical chamber
This is a Head Direction Cell Analysis protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 13 procedural steps, 2 equipment items, 2 materials. Extracted from a 1990 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
rat • not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified • 7
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Electrode implantation and recording setup • LED attachment to animal's head • Establish environmental cue
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Prepare recording electrodes for postsubicular neuron recordings in freely moving rats
Note: Recordings made from postsubicular neurons
“Recordings were made from postsubicular neurons as rats moved freely throughout a cylindrical chamber”
Secure 2 colored light emitting diodes to the animal's head for position and head direction tracking
Note: One LED used to calculate animal location, relative positions of both LEDs used to calculate head direction
“2 colored light emitting diodes (LEDs) secured to the animal's head. The animal's location was calculated from the position of one of the LEDs and head direction in the horizontal plane calculated from the relative positions of the 2 LEDs”
Tape a white card to the inside wall of the cylindrical chamber as the major orientation cue
Note: This serves as the primary visual reference for head direction
“the major cue for orientation was a white card taped to the inside wall”
Allow rats to move freely throughout the cylindrical chamber while simultaneously recording neural activity and tracking head position via the video/computer system
Note: Cell discharge monitored automatically while LED positions tracked
“An automatic video/computer system monitored cell discharge while simultaneously tracking the position of 2 colored light emitting diodes”
Classify recorded neurons as head-direction cells based on discharge patterns as a function of head direction in the horizontal plane, independent of behavior, location, or trunk position
Note: Approximately 26% of cells met head-direction cell criteria
“Approximately 26% of the cells were classified as head-direction cells because they discharged as a function of the animal's head direction in the horizontal plane, independent of the animal's behavior, location, or trunk position”
Draw vectors in the direction of maximal firing for each head-direction cell and verify they are parallel throughout the recording chamber
Note: Vectors should not converge toward a single point
“For each head-direction cell, vectors drawn in the direction of maximal firing were parallel throughout the recording chamber and did not converge toward a single point”
Generate plots of firing rate versus head direction and fit data to triangular function for each head-direction cell
Note: Each firing-rate/head-direction function adequately described by triangular function
“Plots of firing rate versus head direction showed that each firing-rate/head-direction function was adequately described by a triangular function”
Identify the preferred head direction (maximum firing rate) for each cell and measure firing rates at head directions on either side of preferred direction
Note: Firing rates decrease linearly with angular deviation from preferred direction
“Each cell's maximum firing rate occurred at only one (the preferred) head direction; firing rates at head directions on either side of the preferred direction decreased linearly with angular deviation from the preferred direction”
Determine the range of head-direction angles over which discharge was elevated for each head-direction cell
Note: Directional firing range usually about 90 degrees with little or no discharge outside this range
“The range of head-direction angles over which discharge was elevated (directional firing range) was usually about 90 degrees, with little, if any, discharge at head directions outside this range”
Examine distribution of preferred firing directions across all head-direction cells from all animals
Note: Results from 24 head-direction cells in 7 animals
“Results from 24 head-direction cells in 7 animals showed an equal distribution of preferred firing directions over a 360 degrees angle”
Record maximum firing rate for each head-direction cell
Note: Peak firing rates ranged from 5 to 115 spikes/sec with mean of 35 spikes/sec
“The peak firing rate of head-direction cells varied from 5 to 115 spikes/sec (mean: 35)”
Quantitatively analyze the effect of animal location within the cylinder on directional cell firing
Note: Location had minimal effect on directional cell firing
“Quantitative analysis showed the location of the animal within the cylinder had minimal effect on directional cell firing”
Monitor stability of preferred direction, peak firing rate, and directional firing range for each head-direction cell across multiple recording days
Note: Firing characteristics remained stable for days
“For each head-direction cell, the preferred direction, peak firing rate, and directional firing range remained stable for days”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Quantitative analysis of head-direction cell firing patterns in relation to the animal's head direction, location, and behavior in a cylindrical chamber
Objective
Quantitative analysis of head-direction cell firing patterns in relation to the animal's head direction, location, and behavior in a cylindrical chamber
Subjects
From paperrat • not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified
Sample count
From paper7
Cohort notes
From paperFreely moving rats; 24 head-direction cells analyzed across 7 animals
Electrode implantation and recording setup (not specified)
LED attachment to animal's head (not specified)
Establish environmental cue (not specified)
Free movement recording session (not specified)
Percentage of neurons classified as head-direction cells (26%)
From paperFiring rate versus head direction plotted and fitted to triangular functions.
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Preferred head direction for each cell
From paperFiring rate versus head direction plotted and fitted to triangular functions.
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Peak firing rate (range: 5-115 spikes/sec, mean: 35 spikes/sec)
From paperFiring rate versus head direction plotted and fitted to triangular functions.
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Directional firing range (typically ~90 degrees)
From paperFiring rate versus head direction plotted and fitted to triangular functions.
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Percentage of neurons classified as head-direction cells (26%)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Preferred head direction for each cell
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Peak firing rate (range: 5-115 spikes/sec, mean: 35 spikes/sec)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Directional firing range (typically ~90 degrees)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Firing rate versus head direction plotted and fitted to triangular functions.
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Percentage of neurons classified as head-direction cells (26%); Preferred head direction for each cell; Peak firing rate (range: 5-115 spikes/sec, mean: 35 spikes/sec); Directional firing range (typically ~90 degrees).
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Percentage of neurons classified as head-direction cells (26%), Preferred head direction for each cell, Peak firing rate (range: 5-115 spikes/sec, mean: 35 spikes/sec), Directional firing range (typically ~90 degrees).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
JS Taube et al. (1990). Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis. Journal of Neuroscience
Electrode implantation and recording setup • Protocol step
“Recordings were made from postsubicular neurons as rats moved freely throughout a cylindrical chamber”
LED attachment to animal's head • Protocol step
“2 colored light emitting diodes (LEDs) secured to the animal's head. The animal's location was calculated from the position of one of the LEDs and head direction in the horizontal plane calculated from the relative positions of the 2 LEDs”
Establish environmental cue • Protocol step
“the major cue for orientation was a white card taped to the inside wall”
Free movement recording session • Protocol step
“An automatic video/computer system monitored cell discharge while simultaneously tracking the position of 2 colored light emitting diodes”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified
not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified
not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified
not specified • not specified • not specified • not specified
not specified • not specified
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
13
Evidence Quotes
13
Protocol Items
4
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
13
Evidence
13
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work