Source Paper
Todd W. Vanderah, Luis R. Gardell, Shannon E. Burgess, Mohab Ibrahim, Ahmet Dogrul et al.
Journal of Neuroscience • 2000
The nonopioid actions of spinal dynorphin may promote aspects of abnormal pain after nerve injury. Mechanistic similarities have been suggested between opioid tolerance and neuropathic pain. Here, the hypothesis that spinal dynorphin might mediate effects of sustained spinal opioids was explored. Possible abnormal pain and spinal antinociceptive tolerance were evaluated after intrathecal administration of [D-Ala(2), N-Me-Phe(4), Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO), an opioid mu agonist. Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion) and a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids (tolerance), signs also characteristic of nerve injury. Spinal DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content and a decrease in the mu receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn, signs also seen in the postnerve-injury state. Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia and reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (i.e., antinociception). Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, also reestablished the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine. Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum administration altered baseline non-noxious or noxious thresholds or affected the intrathecal morphine antinociceptive response in saline-infused rats. These data suggest that spinal dynorphin promotes abnormal pain and acts to reduce the antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids (i.e., tolerance). The data also identify a possible mechanism for previously unexplained clinical observations and offer a novel approach for the development of strategies that could improve the long-term use of opioids for pain.
Objective: Evaluate tactile allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and opioid antinociceptive tolerance following intrathecal DAMGO infusion in rats, and assess the role of spinal dynorphin in mediating these effects
This is a Intrathecal DAMGO Administration and Pain Assessment protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 11 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 5 materials. Extracted from a 2000 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Intrathecal DAMGO or saline infusion • Assessment of tactile allodynia • Assessment of thermal hyperalgesia
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Rats received intrathecal administration of DAMGO (opioid µ agonist) or saline as control
Note: DAMGO group served as experimental condition; saline group served as control
“Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia”
Evaluate tactile allodynia in hindpaws of DAMGO-infused and saline-infused rats
Note: Tactile allodynia was observed in DAMGO-infused rats but not saline controls
“Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion)”
Evaluate thermal hyperalgesia in hindpaws of DAMGO-infused and saline-infused rats
Note: Thermal hyperalgesia was observed in DAMGO-infused rats but not saline controls
“Rats infused with DAMGO, but not saline, demonstrated tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia of the hindpaws (during the DAMGO infusion)”
Evaluate decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids following DAMGO infusion
Note: Tolerance was demonstrated as a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids in DAMGO-infused rats
“a decrease in antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal opioids (tolerance), signs also characteristic of nerve injury”
Quantify dynorphin levels in lumbar spinal cord following DAMGO infusion
Note: DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content
“Spinal DAMGO elicited an increase in lumbar dynorphin content”
Evaluate µ receptor immunoreactivity in spinal dorsal horn following DAMGO infusion
Note: DAMGO caused a decrease in µ receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn
“a decrease in the µ receptor immunoreactivity in the spinal dorsal horn, signs also seen in the postnerve-injury state”
Administer dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum intrathecally to block dynorphin effects
Note: Antiserum was used to test the role of dynorphin in mediating DAMGO-induced effects
“Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia and reversed thermal hyperalgesia”
Evaluate tactile allodynia after dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum administration
Note: Dynorphin antiserum blocked tactile allodynia in DAMGO-infused rats
“Intrathecal administration of dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum blocked tactile allodynia”
Evaluate thermal hyperalgesia after dynorphin A(1-17) antiserum administration
Note: Dynorphin antiserum reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (antinociception)
“reversed thermal hyperalgesia to above baseline levels (i.e., antinociception)”
Evaluate whether dynorphin antiserum reestablishes antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine
Note: Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, reestablished morphine antinociceptive potency and efficacy
“Spinal dynorphin antiserum, but not control serum, also reestablished the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of spinal morphine”
Administer dynorphin antiserum or control serum to saline-infused rats to assess baseline effects
Note: Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum altered baseline thresholds or morphine response in saline-infused rats
“Neither dynorphin antiserum nor control serum administration altered baseline non-noxious or noxious thresholds or affected the intrathecal morphine antinociceptive response in saline-infused rats”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Evaluate tactile allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and opioid antinociceptive tolerance following intrathecal DAMGO infusion in rats, and assess the role of spinal dynorphin in mediating these effects
Objective
Evaluate tactile allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and opioid antinociceptive tolerance following intrathecal DAMGO infusion in rats, and assess the role of spinal dynorphin in mediating these effects
Subjects
From paperrat • Not specified • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperNot specified in provided text
Intrathecal DAMGO or saline infusion (Not specified)
Assessment of tactile allodynia (During the DAMGO infusion)
Assessment of thermal hyperalgesia (During the DAMGO infusion)
Assessment of antinociceptive tolerance (Not specified)
Tactile allodynia in hindpaws
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Thermal hyperalgesia in hindpaws
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Antinociceptive potency of spinal opioids
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Tactile allodynia in hindpaws
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Thermal hyperalgesia in hindpaws
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Antinociceptive potency of spinal opioids
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Tactile allodynia in hindpaws; Thermal hyperalgesia in hindpaws; Antinociceptive potency of spinal opioids; Antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Tactile allodynia in hindpaws, Thermal hyperalgesia in hindpaws, Antinociceptive potency of spinal opioids, Antinociceptive efficacy of spinal opioids.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Todd W. Vanderah et al. (2000). Dynorphin Promotes Abnormal Pain and Spinal Opioid Antinociceptive Tolerance. Journal of Neuroscience
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
11
Evidence Quotes
17
Protocol Items
6
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
11
Evidence
17
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work