Source Paper
Source Paper
Anesthesiology • 2010
Background Systemic ketamine can trigger apoptosis in the brain of rodents and primates during susceptible developmental periods. Clinically, spinally administered ketamine may improve the duration or quality of analgesia in children. Ketamine-induced spinal cord toxicity has been reported in adult animals but has not been systematically studied in early development. Methods In anesthetized rat pups, intrathecal ketamine was administered by lumbar percutaneous injection. Changes in mechanical withdrawal threshold evaluated dose-dependent antinociceptive and carrageenan-induced antihyperalgesic effects in rat pups at postnatal day (P) 3 and 21. After intrathecal injection of ketamine at P3, 7, or 21, spinal cords were examined for apoptosis (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3), histopathologic change, and glial responses (ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 and glial fibrillary acid protein). After maximal doses of ketamine or saline at P3 or P21, sensory thresholds and gait analysis were evaluated at P35. Results Intrathecal injection of 3 mg/kg ketamine at P3 and 15 mg/kg at P21 reverses carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia. Baseline neuronal apoptosis in the spinal cord was greater at P3 than P7, predominantly in the dorsal horn. Intrathecal injection of 3-10 mg/kg ketamine in P3 pups (but not 15 mg/kg at P21) acutely increased apoptosis and microglial activation in the spinal cord and altered spinal function (reduced mechanical withdrawal threshold and altered static gait parameters) at P35. Conclusions Because acute pathology and long-term behavioral change occurred in the same dose range as antihyperalgesic effects, the therapeutic ratio of intrathecal ketamine is less than one in the neonatal rat. This measure facilitates comparison of the relative safety of spinally administered analgesic agents.
Objective: Evaluation of dose-dependent antinociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic effects of intrathecal ketamine using mechanical withdrawal thresholds in rat pups at different postnatal ages
This is a Mechanical Withdrawal Threshold Test protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 9 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 7 materials. Extracted from a 2010 paper published in Anesthesiology.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • unknown • Postnatal day (P)3, P7, P21, and P35 • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Anesthetize rat pups • Administer intrathecal ketamine • Evaluate mechanical withdrawal threshold
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Anesthetize rat pups prior to intrathecal injection
Note: Anesthesia type and dosage not specified
“In anesthetized rat pups, intrathecal ketamine was administered by lumbar percutaneous injection”
Perform lumbar percutaneous injection of intrathecal ketamine at multiple doses to evaluate dose-dependent effects
Note: Administered at P3, P7, or P21; multiple doses tested for dose-dependent evaluation
“intrathecal ketamine was administered by lumbar percutaneous injection. Changes in mechanical withdrawal threshold evaluated dose-dependent antinociceptive”
Measure mechanical withdrawal threshold to assess antinociceptive effects following ketamine administration
Note: Evaluated at P3 and P21 timepoints
“Changes in mechanical withdrawal threshold evaluated dose-dependent antinociceptive and carrageenan-induced anti-hyperalgesic effects in postnatal day (P)3 and 21 rat pups”
Administer carrageenan to induce hyperalgesia for testing anti-hyperalgesic effects of ketamine
Note: Used to evaluate anti-hyperalgesic effects at P3 and P21
“carrageenan-induced anti-hyperalgesic effects in postnatal day (P)3 and 21 rat pups”
Following intrathecal ketamine administration at P3, P7, or P21, harvest and examine spinal cords for apoptotic markers
Note: Use Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3 staining
“Following intrathecal ketamine at P3, 7 or 21, spinal cords were examined for apoptosis (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3)”
Examine spinal cord tissue for histopathological changes following ketamine administration
Note: Performed at P3, P7, or P21 timepoints
“spinal cords were examined for apoptosis (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3), histopathological change, and glial responses”
Examine spinal cord tissue for glial responses using Iba1 and GFAP markers
Note: Performed at P3, P7, or P21 timepoints
“spinal cords were examined for apoptosis (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3), histopathological change, and glial responses (ionized calcium binding adapter molecule 1 and glial fibrillary acid protein)”
At P35, measure sensory thresholds in animals that received maximal doses of ketamine or saline at P3 or P21
Note: Long-term follow-up assessment of sensory function
“Following maximal doses of ketamine or saline at P3 or P21, sensory thresholds and gait analysis were evaluated at P35”
At P35, conduct gait analysis in animals that received maximal doses of ketamine or saline at P3 or P21
Note: Long-term follow-up assessment of motor function
“Following maximal doses of ketamine or saline at P3 or P21, sensory thresholds and gait analysis were evaluated at P35”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Evaluation of dose-dependent antinociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic effects of intrathecal ketamine using mechanical withdrawal thresholds in rat pups at different postnatal ages
Objective
Evaluation of dose-dependent antinociceptive and anti-hyperalgesic effects of intrathecal ketamine using mechanical withdrawal thresholds in rat pups at different postnatal ages
Subjects
From paperrat • Not specified • unknown • Postnatal day (P)3, P7, P21, and P35 • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperPups tested at multiple developmental timepoints; sensory thresholds and gait analysis evaluated at P35 following maximal doses at P3 or P21
Anesthetize rat pups (Not specified)
Administer intrathecal ketamine (Not specified)
Evaluate mechanical withdrawal threshold (Not specified)
Induce hyperalgesia with carrageenan (Not specified)
Mechanical withdrawal threshold values
From paperNot specified
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Dose-dependent antinociceptive effects
From paperNot specified
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Anti-hyperalgesic effects following carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia
From paperNot specified
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Apoptosis markers (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3)
From paperNot specified
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Mechanical withdrawal threshold values
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Dose-dependent antinociceptive effects
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Anti-hyperalgesic effects following carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Apoptosis markers (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Mechanical withdrawal threshold values; Dose-dependent antinociceptive effects; Anti-hyperalgesic effects following carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia; Apoptosis markers (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3).
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Mechanical withdrawal threshold values, Dose-dependent antinociceptive effects, Anti-hyperalgesic effects following carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia, Apoptosis markers (Fluoro-Jade C and activated caspase-3).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Suellen M. Walker et al. (2010). Effects of Intrathecal Ketamine in the Neonatal Rat. Anesthesiology
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
9
Evidence Quotes
17
Protocol Items
8
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
9
Evidence
17
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work