Source Paper
Hippocampal representation in place learning
H Eichenbaum, C Stewart, RG Morris
Journal of Neuroscience • 1990
View Abstract
The generality of the place-learning impairment associated with hippocampal system damage was challenged using methods of training that permitted subjects to form an individual association between the place of escape and a particular navigational route in an open-field water maze. Both normal rats and rats with fornix lesions (FX rats) acquired this task rapidly, although FX rats were slightly slower in achieving minimum escape latencies. In postcriterion testing, FX rats occasionally made near misses but, more often, their escape performance was indistinguishable from that of intact rats. Results from a variety of probe tests indicated that FX rats, like normal rats, had based their performance on a representation of multiple distal cues but their representation, unlike that of normal rats, was inflexible in that it could not be used to guide performance when the cues or starting position were altered. These results parallel those from other studies of hippocampal function in animals and humans: The learning deficit consequent to hippocampal system damage (1) is not specific to a particular category of learning materials, but is dependent on the representational demands of the task; (2) is observed when task demands encourage a representation based on relations among multiple cues, but not when the task encourages adaptation to an individual (or compound) stimulus; (3) spares acquisition of fundamental procedures needed to perform the task; and (4) impairs the flexible use of learned information in tests other than repetition of the learning experience.
Morris Water Maze
Objective: To test hippocampal representation in place learning by examining whether subjects can form associations between escape locations and navigational routes using distal cues in an open-field water maze, and to assess the flexibility of learned spatial representations
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Equipment1
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
1 item available from ConductScience
Estimated: $690.00
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Product links help support this free resource.
Protocol Steps
Task acquisition training
Subjects trained to rapidly acquire the task of associating a place of escape with a particular navigational route using distal cues
Note: Both normal rats and FX rats acquired this task rapidly, although FX rats were slightly slower in achieving minimum escape latencies
View evidence from paper
“Both normal rats and rats with fornix lesions (FX rats) acquired this task rapidly, although FX rats were slightly slower in achieving minimum escape latencies”
Post-criterion testing
Testing conducted after subjects reached criterion performance to assess escape performance consistency
Note: FX rats occasionally made near misses but more often their escape performance was indistinguishable from normal rats
View evidence from paper
“In postcriterion testing, FX rats occasionally made near misses but, more often, their escape performance was indistinguishable from that of intact rats”
Probe tests with cue alterations
Variety of probe tests conducted to assess whether performance was based on representation of multiple distal cues and whether this representation was flexible when cues or starting position were altered
Note: FX rats based performance on multiple distal cues but representation was inflexible and could not guide performance when cues or starting position were altered, unlike normal rats
View evidence from paper
“Results from a variety of probe tests indicated that FX rats, like normal rats, had based their performance on a representation of multiple distal cues but their representation, unlike that of normal rats, was inflexible in that it could not be used to guide performance when the cues or starting position were altered”