Source Paper
Cannabinoid Receptor Activation in the Basolateral Amygdala Blocks the Effects of Stress on the Conditioning and Extinction of Inhibitory Avoidance
Eti Ganon-Elazar, Irit Akirav
Journal of Neuroscience • 2009
View Abstract
Despite the efficacy of behavior therapy for human anxiety disorders, extinction-like treatments require repeated cue exposures and are vulnerable to reversal by a number of environmental factors, particularly stress. The endocannabinoid system has recently emerged as important in the regulation of extinction learning and in the regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. Here, we aimed to examine the involvement of the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in inhibitory avoidance (IA) conditioning and extinction and to test whether cannabinoid activation would reverse the effects of stress on these memory processes. The synthetic full agonist of the CB 1 /CB 2 receptor WIN55,212-2 [ R -(+)-(2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl]pyrol[1,2,3-de]-1,4- benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl) methanone monomethanesulfonate] (5 µg/0.5 µl) microinjected into the BLA had no effect on IA conditioning or extinction by itself. However, microinjecting WIN55,212-2 into the BLA before exposing the rats to a stressor reversed the enhancing effects of the stressor on IA conditioning and its impairing effects on IA extinction. Importantly, WIN55,212-2 microinjected into the BLA reduced stress-induced elevations in corticosterone levels. Control experiments demonstrated the following: (1) the effects of WIN55,212-2 could not be attributed to sensorimotor deficits, because these parameters seemed unchanged by WIN55,212-2 microinjected into the BLA; and (2) the CB 1 receptor in the BLA is crucially involved in the extinction of IA, because the CB 1 receptor antagonist AM251 [ N -1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl- N -1-piperidinyl-1 H -pyrazole-3-carboxamide] (6 ng/0.5 µl) microinjected into the BLA significantly blocked extinction. Together, our findings may support a wide therapeutic application for cannabinoids in the treatment of conditions associated with the inappropriate retention of aversive memories and stress-related disorders.
Sensorimotor Assessment
Objective: Control experiments to verify that cannabinoid microinjection does not impair sensorimotor function
This is a Sensorimotor Assessment protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 2 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 1 materials. Extracted from a 2009 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
rat • Not specified • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Microinjection of WIN55,212-2 • Assessment of sensorimotor parameters
Primary readouts
- Sensorimotor parameters
- Presence or absence of sensorimotor deficits following WIN55,212-2 microinjection
Key equipment and reagents
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
- Verify the animal model, intervention setup, and collection timepoints against the source paper.
- Check that every direct vendor link matches the exact specification your lab plans to run.
Use the page like this
- Work through the protocol steps in order and use the inline vendor chips only when you need to source or verify an item.
- Jump to Experimental Context for readouts, data shape, and analysis flow before planning downstream analysis.
Protocol Steps
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Microinjection of WIN55,212-2
Microinject WIN55,212-2 into the basolateral amygdala at specified dose
Note: Dose: 5 µg/0.5 µl per injection into BLA
View evidence from paper
“The synthetic full agonist of the CB1/CB2 receptor WIN55,212-2 (5 µg/0.5 µl) microinjected into the BLA”
Assessment of sensorimotor parameters
Evaluate sensorimotor function following WIN55,212-2 microinjection to determine if drug causes sensorimotor deficits
Note: Control experiments to verify effects are not due to sensorimotor impairment
View evidence from paper
“the effects of WIN55,212-2 could not be attributed to sensorimotor deficits, because these parameters seemed unchanged by WIN55,212-2 microinjected into the BLA”