Source Paper
Sebastiaan van Gorp, Marjolein Leerink, Osamu Kakinohana, Oleksandr Platoshyn, Camila Santucci et al.
Stem Cell Research & Therapy • 2013
Abstract Introduction Intraspinal grafting of human neural stem cells represents a promising approach to promote recovery of function after spinal trauma. Such a treatment may serve to: I) provide trophic support to improve survival of host neurons; II) improve the structural integrity of the spinal parenchyma by reducing syringomyelia and scarring in trauma-injured regions; and III) provide neuronal populations to potentially form relays with host axons, segmental interneurons, and/or α-motoneurons. Here we characterized the effect of intraspinal grafting of clinical grade human fetal spinal cord-derived neural stem cells (HSSC) on the recovery of neurological function in a rat model of acute lumbar (L3) compression injury. Methods Three-month-old female Sprague–Dawley rats received L3 spinal compression injury. Three days post-injury, animals were randomized and received intraspinal injections of either HSSC, media-only, or no injections. All animals were immunosuppressed with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone acetate from the day of cell grafting and survived for eight weeks. Motor and sensory dysfunction were periodically assessed using open field locomotion scoring, thermal/tactile pain/escape thresholds and myogenic motor evoked potentials. The presence of spasticity was measured by gastrocnemius muscle resistance and electromyography response during computer-controlled ankle rotation. At the end-point, gait (CatWalk), ladder climbing, and single frame analyses were also assessed. Syrinx size, spinal cord dimensions, and extent of scarring were measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Differentiation and integration of grafted cells in the host tissue were validated with immunofluorescence staining using human-specific antibodies. Results Intraspinal grafting of HSSC led to a progressive and significant improvement in lower extremity paw placement, amelioration of spasticity, and normalization in thermal and tactile pain/escape thresholds at eight weeks post-grafting. No significant differences were detected in other CatWalk parameters, motor evoked potentials, open field locomotor (Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotion score (BBB)) score or ladder climbing test. Magnetic resonance imaging volume reconstruction and immunofluorescence analysis of grafted cell survival showed near complete injury-cavity-filling by grafted cells and development of putative GABA-ergic synapses between grafted and host neurons. Conclusions Peri-acute intraspinal grafting of HSSC can represent an effective therapy which ameliorates motor and sensory deficits after traumatic spinal cord injury.
Objective: Measurement of gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response evoked by computer-controlled ankle rotation to assess motor function recovery following spinal cord injury
This is a Spasticity Assessment protocol using rat as the model organism. The procedure involves 15 procedural steps, 10 equipment items, 4 materials. Extracted from a 2013 paper published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy.
Model and subjects
rat • SD (Sprague Dawley) • female • 12-week-old • 12
Study window
~20 minutes hands-on
Core workflow
Animal anesthesia • Position animal in stereotaxic frame • Elevate animal and apply heating
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Anesthetize animal with isoflurane in room air
Note: 5% for induction, 1.5% to 2% for maintenance
“Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (5% induction, 1.5% to 2% maintenance; in room air)”
Place anesthetized animal into Lab Standard Stereotaxic frame
“placed into a Lab Standard Stereotaxic frame (Stoelting, Cat# 51600, Wood Dale, IL, USA)”
Elevate animal 2 cm on homeothermic heating blanket set at 37°C with rectal thermometer feedback
Note: Heating blanket provides feedback control via rectal thermometer
“The animal was elevated 2 cm by placing it on a homeothermic heating blanket (set at 37°C with feedback from a rectal thermometer”
Place animal in Spine Adaptors for stabilization during surgery
“The animal was then placed in Spine Adaptors (Stoelting, Cat# 51695, Wood Dale, IL, USA)”
Perform wide Th13 laminectomy using air-powered dental drill and binocular microscope to expose dorsal surface of L3 spinal segment
Note: Exposes L3 segment for subsequent compression
“A wide Th13 laminectomy was performed using an air-powered dental drill and binocular microscope (exposing the dorsal surface of spinal segment L3)”
Slowly lower acrylic rod (∅ 2.9 mm, length 15 cm; 35 g) onto exposed L3 segment until it slightly touches spinal cord without inducing compression
Note: Rod should touch but not compress at this stage
“An acrylic rod (∅ 2.9 mm, length 15 cm; 35 g) was then slowly lowered onto the exposed L3 segment until it slightly touched the spinal cord but without inducing any compression”
Fill laminectomy site with mineral oil and submerge thermocouple tip (Physitemp IT-14) to touch dura for temperature monitoring
Note: Thermocouple will monitor spinal cord/dura temperature
“The laminectomy site was then filled with mineral oil in which the tip of a small thermocouple (Physitemp, Cat# IT-14, Clifton, NJ, USA) was submerged and touched the dura”
Focus fiber optic light pipes from surgical light onto surgical site and manually regulate light intensity to warm spinal cord/mineral oil to 37°C ± 0.3°C
Note: Light intensity is manually adjusted for temperature control
“The light from the two fiber optic light pipes of the surgical light (Fiber-Lite, Cat# MI-150 & BGG1823M, Dolan-Jenner, Boxborough, MA, USA) was focused on the surgical site and the light intensity was manually regulated so that the spinal cord/mineral oil was warmed to 37°C”
If necessary, use 100 W infrared lamp to gradually adjust and maintain animal core temperature at 37°C (rectal)
Note: Used as supplementary heating if needed
“If necessary, a 100 W infrared lamp was used to gradually adjust and maintain the animal's core temperature at 37°C (rectal)”
Maintain both paraspinal and rectal temperatures at 37°C ± 0.3°C for at least five minutes before proceeding with compression
Note: Both temperatures must be stable before compression begins
“When both temperatures (that is, paraspinal and rectal) were at 37 ± 0.3°C for at least five minutes, the rod was slowly lowered”
Slowly lower rod until its weight fully rests perpendicularly on spinal cord
Note: Rod weight (35 g) provides compression force
“the rod was slowly lowered until its weight fully rested, perpendicularly, on the spinal cord”
Keep rod in place on spinal cord while maintaining both paraspinal and rectal temperatures at 37°C ± 0.3°C
Note: Critical to maintain temperature stability during compression period
“The rod was kept in place for 15 minutes, while both temperatures were maintained at 37 ± 0.3°C”
After 15-minute compression period, remove rod and mineral oil from laminectomy site
“After spinal compression, the rod and mineral oil were removed”
Suture wound in anatomical layers
“the wound sutured in anatomical layers”
Periodically test gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response evoked by computer-controlled ankle rotation to assess motor function recovery
Note: Testing performed during two-month post-treatment survival period
“periodically tested for recovery of motor/sensory functions, changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response evoked by computer-controlled ankle rotation”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Measurement of gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response evoked by computer-controlled ankle rotation to assess motor function recovery following spinal cord injury
Objective
Measurement of gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response evoked by computer-controlled ankle rotation to assess motor function recovery following spinal cord injury
Subjects
From paperrat • SD (Sprague Dawley) • female • 12-week-old
Sample count
From paper12
Cohort notes
From paperFemale rats chosen based on previous experience demonstrating better tolerability to spinal trauma-related side effects such as urinary retention
Animal anesthesia
Position animal in stereotaxic frame
Elevate animal and apply heating
Position spine in adaptors
Gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response to computer-controlled ankle rotation
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Motor function recovery
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Sensory function recovery
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Motor evoked potentials (MEPs)
From paperNot explicitly described in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response to computer-controlled ankle rotation
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Motor function recovery
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Sensory function recovery
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Motor evoked potentials (MEPs)
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Acquisition
Capture matched images from the relevant tissue region using the same acquisition settings across samples.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not explicitly described in the provided methods section
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response to computer-controlled ankle rotation; Motor function recovery; Sensory function recovery; Motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
Normalization
Normalize image-derived measurements against the matched acquisition or segmentation rules before comparing groups.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Gastrocnemius muscle spasticity response to computer-controlled ankle rotation, Motor function recovery, Sensory function recovery, Motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Sebastiaan van Gorp et al. (2013). Amelioration of motor/sensory dysfunction and spasticity in a rat model of acute lumbar spinal cord injury by human neural stem cell transplantation. Stem Cell Research & Therapy
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Stoelting • 51600
Harvard Apparatus • 507214
Harvard Apparatus • 507214
Stoelting • 51695
Physitemp • IT-14
Dolan-Jenner • MI-150 & BGG1823M
1 item with ReplicateScience direct pages
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
15
Evidence Quotes
29
Protocol Items
14
Linked Products
1
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
15
Evidence
29
Specific Products
1/1
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.