Source Paper
Oleg Butovsky, Shafiuddin Siddiqui, Galina Gabriely, Amanda J. Lanser, Ben Dake et al.
Journal of Clinical Investigation • 2012
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive disease associated with neuronal cell death that is thought to involve aberrant immune responses. Here we investigated the role of innate immunity in a mouse model of ALS. We found that inflammatory monocytes were activated and that their progressive recruitment to the spinal cord, but not brain, correlated with neuronal loss. We also found a decrease in resident microglia in the spinal cord with disease progression. Prior to disease onset, splenic Ly6Chi monocytes expressed a polarized macrophage phenotype (M1 signature), which included increased levels of chemokine receptor CCR2. As disease onset neared, microglia expressed increased CCL2 and other chemotaxis-associated molecules, which led to the recruitment of monocytes to the CNS by spinal cord-derived microglia. Treatment with anti-Ly6C mAb modulated the Ly6Chi monocyte cytokine profile, reduced monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, diminished neuronal loss, and extended survival. In humans with ALS, the analogous monocytes (CD14+CD16-) exhibited an ALS-specific microRNA inflammatory signature similar to that observed in the ALS mouse model, linking the animal model and the human disease. Thus, the profile of monocytes in ALS patients may serve as a biomarker for disease stage or progression. Our results suggest that recruitment of inflammatory monocytes plays an important role in disease progression and that modulation of these cells is a potential therapeutic approach.
Objective: To assess the effects of anti-Ly6C monoclonal antibody treatment on inflammatory monocyte modulation, monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, neuronal loss, and survival in a mouse model of ALS
This is a Anti-Ly6C Monoclonal Antibody Treatment protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 8 procedural steps, 1 materials. Extracted from a 2012 paper published in Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Model and subjects
mouse • Not explicitly stated in provided text • unknown • Not explicitly stated in provided text • Not explicitly stated in provided text
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Establish ALS mouse model baseline • Monitor monocyte activation and recruitment • Assess microglia chemotaxis signaling
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Use mouse model of ALS to establish baseline conditions prior to disease onset and monitor disease progression
Note: Monitoring includes assessment of splenic Ly6C hi monocytes and microglia phenotype
“Prior to disease onset, splenic Ly6C hi monocytes expressed a polarized macrophage phenotype (M1 signature)”
Track inflammatory monocyte activation and their progressive recruitment to the spinal cord, correlating with neuronal loss
Note: Recruitment to spinal cord but not brain was monitored; resident microglia decrease was also assessed
“inflammatory monocytes were activated and that their progressive recruitment to the spinal cord, but not brain, correlated with neuronal loss”
Evaluate microglia expression of chemotaxis-associated molecules including CCL2 as disease onset approaches
Note: Microglia-derived signals lead to monocyte recruitment to CNS
“As disease onset neared, microglia expressed increased CCL2 and other chemotaxis-associated molecules, which led to the recruitment of monocytes to the CNS”
Treat ALS mice with anti-Ly6C mAb to modulate inflammatory monocytes
Note: Treatment timing relative to disease progression not specified in provided text
“Treatment with anti-Ly6C mAb modulated the Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile, reduced monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord”
Evaluate changes in Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile following anti-Ly6C mAb treatment
Note: Cytokine profile modulation is a primary outcome of treatment
“Treatment with anti-Ly6C mAb modulated the Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile”
Measure reduction in monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord following treatment
Note: Spinal cord-specific recruitment is the focus, not brain recruitment
“reduced monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, diminished neuronal loss, and extended survival”
Evaluate neuronal loss in treated versus untreated ALS mice
Note: Neuronal loss is correlated with monocyte recruitment
“diminished neuronal loss, and extended survival”
Track survival duration in anti-Ly6C mAb treated mice compared to controls
Note: Extended survival is a primary outcome measure
“Treatment with anti-Ly6C mAb modulated the Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile, reduced monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, diminished neuronal loss, and extended survival”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
To assess the effects of anti-Ly6C monoclonal antibody treatment on inflammatory monocyte modulation, monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, neuronal loss, and survival in a mouse model of ALS
Objective
To assess the effects of anti-Ly6C monoclonal antibody treatment on inflammatory monocyte modulation, monocyte recruitment to the spinal cord, neuronal loss, and survival in a mouse model of ALS
Subjects
From papermouse • Not explicitly stated in provided text • unknown • Not explicitly stated in provided text • Not explicitly stated in provided text
Cohort notes
From paperALS mouse model used; disease progression monitored from prior to disease onset through disease progression
Establish ALS mouse model baseline (Not explicitly stated)
Monitor monocyte activation and recruitment (Throughout disease progression)
Assess microglia chemotaxis signaling (As disease onset neared)
Administer anti-Ly6C monoclonal antibody treatment (Not explicitly stated)
Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile modulation
From paperNot explicitly stated in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Monocyte recruitment to spinal cord
From paperNot explicitly stated in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Neuronal loss quantification
From paperNot explicitly stated in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Survival duration
From paperNot explicitly stated in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile modulation
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Monocyte recruitment to spinal cord
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Neuronal loss quantification
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Survival duration
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not explicitly stated in provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile modulation; Monocyte recruitment to spinal cord; Neuronal loss quantification; Survival duration.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Ly6C hi monocyte cytokine profile modulation, Monocyte recruitment to spinal cord, Neuronal loss quantification, Survival duration.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Oleg Butovsky et al. (2012). Modulating inflammatory monocytes with a unique microRNA gene signature ameliorates murine ALS. Journal of Clinical Investigation
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not explicitly stated in provided text • Not mentioned • Not mentioned • Not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
8
Evidence Quotes
9
Protocol Items
1
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
8
Evidence
9
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work