Source Paper
Synchronous Neuronal Activity Is a Signal for Axonal Sprouting after Cortical Lesions in the Adult
S. Thomas Carmichael, Marie-Françoise Chesselet
Journal of Neuroscience • 2002
View Abstract
The ability of the adult brain to form new connections in areas denervated by a lesion (axonal sprouting) is more widespread than previously thought, but mechanisms remain unknown. We have previously demonstrated an unexpected, robust axonal sprouting of contralateral corticostriatal neurons into the denervated striatum after ischemic cortical lesions. We now take advantage of marked differences in the degree of axonal sprouting from contralateral homotypic cortex after two types of cortical lesions to define the role of neuronal activity in this response. Thermal–ischemic lesions (TCL) of sensorimotor cortex, which induce axonal sprouting, produced two sequential patterns of low-frequency, synchronized neuronal activity that are not seen after similarly sized aspiration lesions, which do not induce axonal sprouting. An early rhythm of synchronous neuronal activity occurred in perilesion cortex on day 1 after lesion, with a frequency range of 0.2–2 Hz. A later pattern of activity occurred on days 2 and 3 after lesion, with a frequency range of 0.1–0.4 Hz. This second rhythm synchronized neuronal activity across widespread areas, including the cortical areas that contain the cell bodies of the sprouting axons. TTX was used to block this patterned neuronal activity and determine whether axonal sprouting was prevented. Chronic TTX infusion into the lesion site blocked the synchronous neuronal activity after TCL as well as axonal sprouting. Thus, both after different types of lesions and in the blockade experiments axonal sprouting was strongly correlated with synchronous neuronal activity, suggesting a role for this activity in anatomical reorganization after brain lesion in the adult.
Aspiration Lesion
Objective: Induction of aspiration lesions in cortex as a control to compare axonal sprouting response with thermal-ischemic lesions
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Equipment2
Materials1
Not specified in provided text • Not specified in provided text • Not specified in provided text • Not specified in provided text
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Product links help support this free resource.
Protocol Steps
Induce aspiration lesion in sensorimotor cortex
Create similarly sized aspiration lesions in sensorimotor cortex as control lesions to compare with thermal-ischemic lesions
Note: Aspiration lesions do not induce axonal sprouting, unlike thermal-ischemic lesions
View evidence from paper
“similarly sized aspiration lesions, which do not induce axonal sprouting”
Record neuronal activity on day 1 post-lesion
Monitor and record synchronized neuronal activity in perilesion cortex on day 1 after aspiration lesion
Note: Aspiration lesions do not produce the low-frequency synchronized neuronal activity seen with thermal-ischemic lesions
View evidence from paper
“An early rhythm of synchronous neuronal activity occurred in perilesion cortex on day 1 after lesion, with a frequency range of 0.2–2 Hz”
Record neuronal activity on days 2-3 post-lesion
Monitor and record neuronal activity patterns in cortical areas on days 2 and 3 after aspiration lesion
Note: Aspiration lesions do not produce the later pattern of synchronized activity seen with thermal-ischemic lesions
View evidence from paper
“A later pattern of activity occurred on days 2 and 3 after lesion, with a frequency range of 0.1–0.4 Hz”
Compare axonal sprouting response
Assess and compare the degree of axonal sprouting from contralateral homotypic cortex after aspiration lesions versus thermal-ischemic lesions
Note: Aspiration lesions serve as control showing no axonal sprouting response
View evidence from paper
“take advantage of marked differences in the degree of axonal sprouting from contralateral homotypic cortex after two types of cortical lesions”