Source Paper
Memory Reconsolidation and Extinction Have Distinct Temporal and Biochemical Signatures
Akinobu Suzuki, Sheena A. Josselyn, Paul W. Frankland, Shoichi Masushige, Alcino J. Silva et al.
Journal of Neuroscience • 2004
View Abstract
Memory retrieval is not a passive phenomenon. Instead, it triggers a number of processes that either reinforce or alter stored information. Retrieval is thought to activate a second memory consolidation cascade (reconsolidation) that requires protein synthesis. Here, we show that the temporal dynamics of memory reconsolidation are dependent on the strength and age of the memory, such that younger and weaker memories are more easily reconsolidated than older and stronger memories. We also report that reconsolidation and extinction, two opposing processes triggered by memory retrieval, have distinct biochemical signatures: pharmacological antagonism of either cannabinoid receptor 1 or L-type voltage-gated calcium channels blocks extinction but not reconsolidation. These studies demonstrate the dynamic nature of memory processing after retrieval and represent a first step toward a molecular dissection of underlying mechanisms.
Spatial Memory Task
Objective: Unable to extract - methods section text does not contain detailed experimental procedures for the spatial memory task
Protocol Steps
Insufficient procedural information
The provided text is a journal article header and abstract section only. It does not contain the detailed Methods section with specific procedural steps for the spatial memory task.
Note: The text mentions that the study involves 'spatial memory' and examines 'memory reconsolidation and extinction' but does not provide explicit experimental procedures, equipment specifications, or step-by-step protocols.
View evidence from paper
“Memory retrieval is not a passive phenomenon. Instead, it triggers a number of processes that either reinforce or alter stored information.”