Source Paper
Elise F. Hoek-van den Hil, Evert M. van Schothorst, Inge van der Stelt, Hans J. M. Swarts, Marjanne van Vliet et al.
Genes & Nutrition • 2015
Objective: Weekly monitoring of body weight and food intake throughout a 12-week dietary intervention period in mice receiving normal-fat or high-fat diets with or without flavonoid supplementation
This is a Body Weight and Food Intake Monitoring protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 12 procedural steps, 4 equipment items, 9 materials. Extracted from a 2015 paper published in Genes & Nutrition.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57BL/6JOlaHsd • male • 9 weeks at arrival • Not specified • 84
Study window
~12 week study window | ~8 hours hands-on
Core workflow
Animal arrival and acclimation • Initial diet during adaptation period (days 1-5) • Transition to semi-synthetic diet (days 6-21 of adaptation)
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Eighty-four male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice arrived at 9 weeks of age and were individually housed under controlled conditions
Note: Controlled conditions: 12h/12h light-dark cycle, 55±15% humidity, ad libitum access to food and water
“Eighty-four male C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice (Harlan Laboratories, Horst, The Netherlands) were individually housed under controlled conditions (temperature 21°C, 12 h/12 h light–dark cycle, 55 ± 15 % humidity), with ad libitum access to food and water. At arrival, the mice were 9 weeks of age.”
During the first 5 days of the 3-week adaptation period, mice were fed standard Harlan chow diet
Note: Ad libitum access
“During the first 5 days of a 3-week adaptation period, mice were fed a standard Harlan chow diet”
Following the initial 5-day period, mice were fed a standardised semi-synthetic normal-fat diet (NF, 10 energy% fat) with the same dietary constituents as the intervention high-fat diet
Note: Ad libitum access. This diet has the same constituents as the HF diet but with carbohydrates substituted with fats in the HF diet
“followed by a standardised semi-synthetic normal-fat diet [NF, 10 energy% (en%) fat] with the same dietary constituents as the intervention high-fat diet (HF, 40 en%) in which carbohydrates were substituted with fats”
At the start of the 12-week intervention period, mice were stratified based on body weight over 7 groups (n=12 per group) to obtain identical groups for this important parameter
Note: Stratification ensures balanced groups for the intervention
“At the start of the 12-week intervention period, mice were stratified based on body weight over 7 groups ( n = 12)”
One group of mice continued on normal-fat diet (NF), while the other six groups received high-fat diet (HF) with or without supplementation of different flavonoids (HF+flavonoids). Flavonoids were added in equimolar amounts to HF (0.01 mol/kg diet): quercetin 0.33% (w/w), hesperetin 0.33%, epicatechin 0.32%, apigenin 0.29%, and anthocyanins 0.5%
Note: Ad libitum access to assigned diet. Flavonoid amounts based on previous results showing effectiveness of quercetin at this concentration
“One group of mice continued on NF, while the other six groups of mice received HF with or without supplementation of different flavonoids (HF + flavonoids). Flavonoids were added in equimolar amounts to HF (0.01 mol/kg diet)”
Body weight was measured weekly throughout the 12-week intervention period
Note: Monitoring continues throughout the entire intervention period
“Body weight and food intake were monitored weekly”
Food intake was measured weekly throughout the 12-week intervention period
Note: Monitoring continues throughout the entire intervention period
“Body weight and food intake were monitored weekly”
Faeces were collected from mice during weeks 11 and 12 of the intervention period
Note: Collection during final 2 weeks of intervention
“Faeces were collected in weeks 11 and 12”
At the end of the intervention, all mice were fasted for 2-4 hours during the light phase
Note: Fasting conducted during light phase of light-dark cycle
“At the end of the intervention, all mice were fasted for 2–4 h during the light phase”
Mice were anesthetised by inhalation of 5% isoflurane using O2 as a carrier
Note: Conducted after fasting period
“anesthetised by inhalation of 5 % isoflurane using O 2 as a carrier”
Blood was sampled via orbital extraction into serum collection tubes (Greiner Bio-one, Longwood, USA)
Note: Serum was separated and stored at -80°C
“Blood was sampled via orbital extraction in collect serum tubes (Greiner Bio-one, Longwood, USA) and stored at −80 °C after obtaining serum”
After blood collection, mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Liver, epididymal white adipose tissue (epiWAT), and mesenteric white adipose tissue (mesWAT) were dissected, weighed, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen
Note: Tissues were stored at -80°C after snap freezing
“After blood collection, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and liver, epididymal and mesenteric white adipose tissues (epiWAT and mesWAT, resp.) were dissected, weighted and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Weekly monitoring of body weight and food intake throughout a 12-week dietary intervention period in mice receiving normal-fat or high-fat diets with or without flavonoid supplementation
Objective
Weekly monitoring of body weight and food intake throughout a 12-week dietary intervention period in mice receiving normal-fat or high-fat diets with or without flavonoid supplementation
Subjects
From papermouse • C57BL/6JOlaHsd • male • 9 weeks at arrival • Not specified
Sample count
From paper84
Cohort notes
From paperIndividually housed under controlled conditions (temperature 21°C, 12h/12h light-dark cycle, 55±15% humidity), with ad libitum access to food and water.
Animal arrival and acclimation (Not specified)
Initial diet during adaptation period (days 1-5) (5 days)
Transition to semi-synthetic diet (days 6-21 of adaptation) (Remainder of 3-week adaptation period (approximately 16 days))
Stratification by body weight (Single time point)
Body weight (measured weekly)
From paperNot specified in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Food intake (measured weekly)
From paperNot specified in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Energy intake (calculated from food intake)
From paperNot specified in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Faecal output (collected weeks 11-12)
From paperNot specified in the provided methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Body weight (measured weekly)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Food intake (measured weekly)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Energy intake (calculated from food intake)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Faecal output (collected weeks 11-12)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in the provided methods section
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Body weight (measured weekly); Food intake (measured weekly); Energy intake (calculated from food intake); Faecal output (collected weeks 11-12).
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Body weight (measured weekly), Food intake (measured weekly), Energy intake (calculated from food intake), Faecal output (collected weeks 11-12).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Elise F. Hoek-van den Hil et al. (2015). Direct comparison of metabolic health effects of the flavonoids quercetin, hesperetin, epicatechin, apigenin and anthocyanins in high-fat-diet-fed mice. Genes & Nutrition
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Harlan Laboratories • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Research Diets Services B.V. • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Research Diets Services B.V. • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Sigma • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Bioconnect • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Sigma • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Fuzhou Corona Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd. • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Medox, Polyphenols Laboratories • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Greiner Bio-one • Not specified • Not specified • Not mentioned
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
12
Evidence Quotes
25
Protocol Items
13
Linked Products
0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
12
Evidence
25
Specific Products
0/0
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.
What still needs work