Source Paper
Age-related changes in behavior in C57BL/6J mice from young adulthood to middle age
Hirotaka Shoji, Keizo Takao, Satoko Hattori, Tsuyoshi Miyakawa
Molecular Brain • 2016
Contextual and Cued Fear Conditioning
Objective: Assessment of fear memory formation and recall in response to contextual and cued stimuli
This is a Contextual and Cued Fear Conditioning protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 4 procedural steps, 2 equipment items, 4 materials. Extracted from a 2016 paper published in Molecular Brain.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57BL/6J • male • Not specified • Not specified • 1739
Study window
~1 day study window
Core workflow
Animal housing and maintenance • Behavioral test battery ordering • Behavioral testing timing
Primary readouts
- Fear memory formation in response to contextual stimuli
- Fear memory formation in response to cued stimuli
- Fear memory recall
Key equipment and reagents
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
- Verify the animal model, intervention setup, and collection timepoints against the source paper.
- Check that every direct vendor link matches the exact specification your lab plans to run.
Use the page like this
- Work through the protocol steps in order and use the inline vendor chips only when you need to source or verify an item.
- Jump to Experimental Context for readouts, data shape, and analysis flow before planning downstream analysis.
Protocol Steps
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Animal housing and maintenance
Mice were housed in plastic cages with sterilized PaperClean Bedding under a 12-hour light/dark cycle with lights on at 7:00 a.m. Food (CRF-1) and water were provided ad libitum.
Note: Housing density varied: 1.3% housed with 1 animal per cage, 2.3% with 2, 6.7% with 3, 80.1% with 4, 8.9% with 5, and 0.7% with 6 animals per cage at the beginning of test battery.
View evidence from paper
“housed in plastic cages with sterilized PaperClean Bedding (Japan SLC) under a 12-hr light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.) with access to food (CRF-1, Oriental Yeast Co., Ltd.) and water ad libitum”
Behavioral test battery ordering
Contextual and cued fear conditioning was performed as part of a standardized behavioral test battery. The general order of tests was: general health and neurological screening, light/dark transition, open field, elevated plus maze, hot plate, social interaction, rotarod, startle response/prepulse inhibition, Porsolt forced swim, Barnes maze, contextual and cued fear conditioning, and tail suspension tests.
Note: More than 75% of mice were subjected to tests in accordance with the standard order, though some strains had tests omitted or reordered.
View evidence from paper
“The mice were generally tested in the following order; general health and neurological screening, light/dark transition, open field, elevated plus maze, hot plate, social interaction, rotarod, startle response/prepulse inhibition, Porsolt forced swim, Barnes maze, contextual and cued fear conditioning, and tail suspension tests. The interval between tests was at least 1 day.”
Behavioral testing timing
All behavioral testing was performed during a specific time window in the active phase of the animals.
Note: Testing occurred during the light phase of the 12-hour light/dark cycle.
View evidence from paper
“Behavioral testing was performed between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.”
Apparatus cleaning and decontamination
After each test, all apparatus were cleaned to prevent bias due to olfactory cues.
Note: Cleaning was performed with super hypochlorous water and 70% ethanol.
View evidence from paper
“After the tests, all apparatus were cleaned with super hypochlorous water and 70% ethanol to prevent a bias due to olfactory cues.”