Source Paper
Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?
Ann E. Hickox, M. Charles Liberman
Journal of Neurophysiology • 2013
View Abstract
Perceptual abnormalities such as hyperacusis and tinnitus often occur after acoustic overexposure. Although such exposure can also result in permanent threshold elevation, some individuals with noise-induced hyperacusis or tinnitus show clinically normal thresholds. Recent work in animals has shown that a “neuropathic” noise exposure can cause immediate, permanent degeneration of the cochlear nerve despite complete threshold recovery and lack of hair cell damage (Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. J Neurosci 29: 14077–14085, 2009; Lin HW, Furman AC, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 12: 605–616, 2011). Here we ask whether this noise-induced primary neuronal degeneration results in abnormal auditory behavior, based on the acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle. Responses were measured in mice exposed either to a “neuropathic” noise or to a lower-intensity, “nonneuropathic” noise and in unexposed control mice. Mice with cochlear neuropathy displayed hyperresponsivity to sound, evidenced by enhanced ASR and PPI, while exposed mice without neuronal loss showed controllike responses. Gap PPI tests, often used to assess tinnitus, revealed limited gap detection deficits in mice with cochlear neuropathy only for certain gap-startle latencies, inconsistent with the presence of tinnitus “filling in the gap.” Despite significantly reduced wave 1 of the auditory brainstem response, representing cochlear nerve activity, later peaks were unchanged or enhanced, suggesting compensatory neural hyperactivity in the auditory brainstem. Considering the rapid postexposure onset of both cochlear neuropathy and exaggerated startle-based behavior, the results suggest a role for cochlear primary neuronal degeneration, per se, in the central neural excitability that could underlie the generation of hyperacusis.
Gap PPI Tests
Objective: Gap detection testing using prepulse inhibition paradigm to assess for tinnitus-related gap filling deficits in mice with noise-induced cochlear neuropathy
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
1 item available from ConductScience
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Product links help support this free resource.
Protocol Steps
Noise exposure conditions
Mice were exposed to either neuropathic noise, nonneuropathic noise, or served as unexposed controls
Note: Neuropathic noise exposure causes immediate, permanent degeneration of cochlear nerve despite complete threshold recovery and lack of hair cell damage
View evidence from paper
“Mice exposed either to a neuropathic noise or to a lower-intensity, nonneuropathic noise and in unexposed control mice”
Gap PPI testing
Gap detection testing using prepulse inhibition of startle paradigm to assess for tinnitus-related gap filling deficits
Note: Gap PPI tests revealed limited gap detection deficits in mice with cochlear neuropathy only for certain gap-startle latencies
View evidence from paper
“Gap PPI tests, often used to assess tinnitus, revealed limited gap detection deficits in mice with cochlear neuropathy only for certain gap-startle latencies”
Measure acoustic startle response
Measure enhanced ASR in mice with cochlear neuropathy compared to controls
Note: Mice with cochlear neuropathy displayed hyperresponsivity to sound, evidenced by enhanced ASR
View evidence from paper
“Mice with cochlear neuropathy displayed hyperresponsivity to sound, evidenced by enhanced ASR and PPI”
Measure prepulse inhibition of startle
Measure PPI responses in mice with and without cochlear neuropathy
Note: Enhanced PPI observed in mice with cochlear neuropathy; exposed mice without neuronal loss showed control-like responses
View evidence from paper
“Mice with cochlear neuropathy displayed hyperresponsivity to sound, evidenced by enhanced ASR and PPI, while exposed mice without neuronal loss showed controllike responses”
Record auditory brainstem response
Measure ABR wave 1 and later peaks to assess cochlear nerve activity and brainstem response
Note: Wave 1 significantly reduced in neuropathic mice; later peaks unchanged or enhanced, suggesting compensatory neural hyperactivity
View evidence from paper
“Despite significantly reduced wave 1 of the auditory brainstem response, representing cochlear nerve activity, later peaks were unchanged or enhanced”