Source Paper
Jesús Planagumà, Frank Leypoldt, Francesco Mannara, Javier Gutiérrez-Cuesta, Elena Martín-García et al.
Brain • 2014
Anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder that associates with prominent memory and behavioural deficits. Patients' antibodies react with the N-terminal domain of the GluN1 (previously known as NR1) subunit of NMDAR causing in cultured neurons a selective and reversible internalization of cell-surface receptors. These effects and the frequent response to immunotherapy have suggested an antibody-mediated pathogenesis, but to date there is no animal model showing that patients' antibodies cause memory and behavioural deficits. To develop such a model, C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps that delivered a continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid (flow rate 0.25 µl/h, 14 days). During and after the infusion period standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preference test), depressive-like behaviours (tail suspension, forced swimming tests), anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), and locomotor activity (horizontal and vertical). Animals sacrificed at Days 5, 13, 18, 26 and 46 were examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis. These experiments showed that animals infused with patients' cerebrospinal fluid, but not control cerebrospinal fluid, developed progressive memory deficits, and anhedonic and depressive-like behaviours, without affecting other behavioural or locomotor tasks. Memory deficits gradually worsened until Day 18 (4 days after the infusion stopped) and all symptoms resolved over the next week. Accompanying brain tissue studies showed progressive increase of brain-bound human antibodies, predominantly in the hippocampus (maximal on Days 13-18), that after acid extraction and characterization with GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells were confirmed to be against the NMDAR. Confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis of the hippocampus showed progressive decrease of the density of total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and total NMDAR protein concentration (maximal on Day 18), without affecting the post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors. These effects occurred in parallel with memory and other behavioural deficits and gradually improved after Day 18, with reversibility of symptoms accompanied by a decrease of brain-bound antibodies and restoration of NMDAR levels. Overall, these findings establish a link between memory and behavioural deficits and antibody-mediated reduction of NMDAR, provide the biological basis by which removal of antibodies and antibody-producing cells improve neurological function, and offer a model for testing experimental therapies in this and similar disorders.
Objective: Assessment of memory function using novel object recognition in an open field paradigm to evaluate cognitive deficits induced by anti-NMDAR antibodies
This is a Novel Object Recognition protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 16 procedural steps, 12 equipment items, 1 materials. Extracted from a 2014 paper published in Brain.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57BL6/J • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
~2 week study window
Core workflow
Surgical implantation of ventricular catheters and osmotic pumps • Continuous CSF infusion • Novel object recognition testing in open field
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps for continuous CSF infusion
Note: Catheters connected to osmotic pumps for continuous infusion
“C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps”
Osmotic pumps delivered continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid into the mouse brain
Note: Flow rate maintained at 0.25 µl/h
“osmotic pumps that delivered a continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid (flow rate 0.25 µl/h, 14 days)”
Standardized memory assessment task performed during and after the infusion period using novel object recognition in an open field paradigm
Note: Conducted during and after the 14-day infusion period
“During and after the infusion period standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms)”
Alternative memory assessment task performed during and after the infusion period using V-maze paradigm
Note: Conducted during and after the 14-day infusion period
“During and after the infusion period standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms)”
Standardized test to assess anhedonic behaviors during and after infusion period
Note: Measures anhedonia (loss of pleasure-seeking behavior)
“standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preference test)”
Standardized test to assess depressive-like behaviors during and after infusion period
Note: Measures depressive-like phenotype
“standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preference test), depressive-like behaviours (tail suspension, forced swimming tests)”
Standardized test to assess depressive-like behaviors during and after infusion period
Note: Measures depressive-like phenotype
“depressive-like behaviours (tail suspension, forced swimming tests)”
Standardized test to assess anxiety-like behaviors during and after infusion period
Note: Measures anxiety phenotype
“anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests)”
Standardized test to assess anxiety-like behaviors during and after infusion period
Note: Measures anxiety phenotype
“anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests)”
Standardized test to assess aggressiveness during and after infusion period
Note: Measures aggressive behavior
“aggressiveness (resident-intruder test)”
Measurement of horizontal and vertical locomotor activity during and after infusion period
Note: Assesses general motor function and activity levels
“locomotor activity (horizontal and vertical)”
Animals sacrificed at designated timepoints for brain tissue analysis
Note: Sacrifice timepoints: Days 5, 13, 18, 26, and 46
“Animals sacrificed at Days 5, 13, 18, 26 and 46 were examined for brain-bound antibodies”
Analysis of brain tissue for presence and localization of brain-bound human antibodies
Note: Predominantly examined in hippocampus; maximal on Days 13-18
“Animals sacrificed at Days 5, 13, 18, 26 and 46 were examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters”
Examination of NMDAR clusters and protein concentration in hippocampal tissue using confocal microscopy
Note: Assessed total and synaptic NMDAR clusters; also examined PSD95 and AMPA receptors
“examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis”
Biochemical analysis of NMDAR protein concentration and other synaptic proteins in hippocampal tissue
Note: Measured total NMDAR protein concentration, PSD95, and AMPA receptors
“examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis”
Brain tissue subjected to acid extraction followed by characterization of antibodies using GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells
Note: Confirmed antibodies were against NMDAR
“after acid extraction and characterization with GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells were confirmed to be against the NMDAR”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Assessment of memory function using novel object recognition in an open field paradigm to evaluate cognitive deficits induced by anti-NMDAR antibodies
Objective
Assessment of memory function using novel object recognition in an open field paradigm to evaluate cognitive deficits induced by anti-NMDAR antibodies
Subjects
From papermouse • C57BL6/J • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperAnimals underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps
Surgical implantation of ventricular catheters and osmotic pumps (Not specified)
Continuous CSF infusion (14 days)
Novel object recognition testing in open field (Not specified)
Novel object recognition testing in V-maze (Not specified)
Memory deficits assessed via novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms
From paperNot explicitly specified in the methods section
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Anhedonic behaviors measured by sucrose preference test
From paperNot explicitly specified in the methods section
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Depressive-like behaviors assessed by tail suspension and forced swimming tests
From paperNot explicitly specified in the methods section
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Anxiety-like behaviors measured by black and white box and elevated plus maze tests
From paperNot explicitly specified in the methods section
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Memory deficits assessed via novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Anhedonic behaviors measured by sucrose preference test
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Depressive-like behaviors assessed by tail suspension and forced swimming tests
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Anxiety-like behaviors measured by black and white box and elevated plus maze tests
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Acquisition
Capture matched images from the relevant tissue region using the same acquisition settings across samples.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not explicitly specified in the methods section
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Memory deficits assessed via novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms; Anhedonic behaviors measured by sucrose preference test; Depressive-like behaviors assessed by tail suspension and forced swimming tests; Anxiety-like behaviors measured by black and white box and elevated plus maze tests.
Normalization
Normalize image-derived measurements against the matched acquisition or segmentation rules before comparing groups.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Memory deficits assessed via novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms, Anhedonic behaviors measured by sucrose preference test, Depressive-like behaviors assessed by tail suspension and forced swimming tests, Anxiety-like behaviors measured by black and white box and elevated plus maze tests.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Jesús Planagumà et al. (2014). Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified
6 items with ReplicateScience direct pages
Estimated: $10,569.00
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Mar 14, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
16
Evidence Quotes
29
Protocol Items
13
Linked Products
6
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
16
Evidence
29
Specific Products
6/6
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.