Source Paper
Source Paper
Michele A. Kelly, Marcelo Rubinstein, Tamara J. Phillips, Christina N. Lessov, Sue Burkhart-Kasch et al.
Journal of Neuroscience • 1998
Locomotor activity is a polygenic trait that varies widely among inbred strains of mice (Flint et al., 1995). To characterize the role of D2 dopamine receptors in locomotion, we generated F 2 hybrid (129/Sv × C57BL/6) D2 dopamine receptor (D2R)-deficient mice by gene targeting and investigated the contribution of genetic background to open-field activity and rotarod performance. Horizontal activity of D2R−/− mice was approximately half that of drug-naive, strain-matched controls but was significantly greater than haloperidol-treated controls, which were markedly hypokinetic. Wild-type 129/SvEv and C57BL/6 mice with functional D2 receptors had greater interstrain differences in spontaneous activity than those among the F 2 hybrid mutants. Incipient congenic strains of D2R-deficient mice demonstrated an orderly gene dosage reduction in locomotion superimposed on both extremes of parental background locomotor activity. In contrast, F 2 hybrid D2R−/− mice had impaired motor coordination on the rotarod that was corrected in the congenic C57BL/6 background. Wild-type 129/SvEv mice had the poorest rotarod ability of all groups tested, suggesting that linked substrain 129 alleles, not the absence of D2 receptors per se, were largely responsible for the reduced function of the F 2 hybrid D2R−/− and D2R+/− mice. Neurochemical and pharmacological studies revealed unexpectedly normal tissue striatal monoamine levels and no evidence for supersensitive D1, D3, or D4 dopamine receptors in the D2R−/− mice. However, after acute monoamine depletion, akinetic D2R+/− mice had a significantly greater synergistic restoration of locomotion in response to SKF38393 and quinpirole compared with any group of D2R+/+ controls. We conclude that D2R-deficient mice are not a model of Parkinson’s disease. Our studies highlight the interaction of multiple genetic factors in the analysis of complex behaviors in gene knock-out mice.
Objective: Measurement of horizontal locomotor activity in an open field to assess spontaneous movement and exploration in D2 dopamine receptor-deficient mice
This is a Open Field Activity Test protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 6 procedural steps, 2 equipment items, 3 materials. Extracted from a 1998 paper published in Journal of Neuroscience.
Model and subjects
mouse • F2 hybrid (129/Sv × C57BL/6), 129/SvEv, C57BL/6, and congenic strains • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
Estimated timing pending
Core workflow
Animal preparation and grouping • Open field activity testing • Rotarod performance testing
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Generate or obtain F2 hybrid (129/Sv × C57BL/6) D2 dopamine receptor-deficient mice, wild-type controls, and congenic strains. Include drug-naive strain-matched controls and haloperidol-treated controls.
Note: Multiple genotypes tested: D2R−/−, D2R+/−, and D2R+/+ mice across different genetic backgrounds
“we generated F2 hybrid (129/Sv × C57BL/6) D2 dopamine receptor (D2R)-deficient mice by gene targeting and investigated the contribution of genetic background to open-field activity”
Place mice in open field apparatus and measure horizontal locomotor activity. Test drug-naive controls, D2R-deficient mice, and haloperidol-treated controls.
Note: Horizontal activity is the primary outcome measure; interstrain differences in spontaneous activity are compared
“Horizontal activity of D2R−/− mice was approximately half that of drug-naive, strain-matched controls but was significantly greater than haloperidol-treated controls, which were markedly hypokinetic”
Test motor coordination and balance using rotarod apparatus in F2 hybrid D2R−/− mice, congenic strains, and wild-type controls.
Note: F2 hybrid D2R−/− mice showed impaired motor coordination that was corrected in congenic C57BL/6 background
“F2 hybrid D2R−/− mice had impaired motor coordination on the rotarod that was corrected in the congenic C57BL/6 background”
Measure tissue striatal monoamine levels in D2R-deficient mice to assess dopamine and related neurotransmitter content.
Note: Results showed unexpectedly normal tissue striatal monoamine levels in D2R−/− mice
“Neurochemical and pharmacological studies revealed unexpectedly normal tissue striatal monoamine levels”
Evaluate D1, D3, and D4 dopamine receptor sensitivity in D2R-deficient mice compared to wild-type controls.
Note: No evidence for supersensitive D1, D3, or D4 dopamine receptors was found in D2R−/− mice
“no evidence for supersensitive D1, D3, or D4 dopamine receptors in the D2R−/− mice”
Deplete monoamines acutely and then administer SKF38393 and quinpirole to assess synergistic restoration of locomotion in D2R+/− mice versus D2R+/+ controls.
Note: D2R+/− mice showed significantly greater synergistic restoration of locomotion compared to D2R+/+ controls
“after acute monoamine depletion, akinetic D2R+/− mice had a significantly greater synergistic restoration of locomotion in response to SKF38393 and quinpirole compared with any group of D2R+/+ controls”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Measurement of horizontal locomotor activity in an open field to assess spontaneous movement and exploration in D2 dopamine receptor-deficient mice
Objective
Measurement of horizontal locomotor activity in an open field to assess spontaneous movement and exploration in D2 dopamine receptor-deficient mice
Subjects
From papermouse • F2 hybrid (129/Sv × C57BL/6), 129/SvEv, C57BL/6, and congenic strains • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperD2R-deficient (D2R−/−), heterozygous (D2R+/−), and wild-type (D2R+/+) mice; drug-naive and haloperidol-treated controls included
Animal preparation and grouping (Not specified)
Open field activity testing (Not specified)
Rotarod performance testing (Not specified)
Neurochemical analysis (Not specified)
Horizontal locomotor activity in open field
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Interstrain differences in spontaneous activity
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Gene dosage effects on locomotion
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Longitudinal gait metrics and per-animal performance tables
Comparison focus
Compare recovery trajectory across post-injury timepoints and treatment conditions
Motor coordination on rotarod
From paperNot specified in provided text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Horizontal locomotor activity in open field
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Interstrain differences in spontaneous activity
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Gene dosage effects on locomotion
From paperRaw artifact
Per-run gait capture with paw placement, timing, and stride features for each animal
Processed artifact
Cleaned gait metrics table and recovery trend summary across timepoints
Final reported form
Group comparisons of gait indices, stride metrics, or recovery curves
Motor coordination on rotarod
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in provided text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Horizontal locomotor activity in open field; Interstrain differences in spontaneous activity; Gene dosage effects on locomotion; Motor coordination on rotarod.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Horizontal locomotor activity in open field, Interstrain differences in spontaneous activity, Gene dosage effects on locomotion, Motor coordination on rotarod.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Michele A. Kelly et al. (1998). Locomotor Activity in D2 Dopamine Receptor-Deficient Mice Is Determined by Gene Dosage, Genetic Background, and Developmental Adaptations. Journal of Neuroscience
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified
2 items with ReplicateScience direct pages
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Mar 14, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
6
Evidence Quotes
11
Protocol Items
5
Linked Products
2
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
6
Evidence
11
Specific Products
2/2
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.