Source Paper
Xiangrong Liu, Jia Liu, Shangfeng Zhao, Haiyue Zhang, Wei Cai et al.
Stroke • 2016
Background and Purpose— Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a unique cytokine that may contribute to brain repair by regulating microglia/macrophage functions. Thus, we examined the effect of IL-4 on long-term recovery and microglia/macrophage polarization in 2 well-established stroke models. Methods— Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion or permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion was induced in wild-type and IL-4 knockout C57/BL6 mice. In a separate cohort of wild-type animals, IL-4 (60 ng/d for 7 days) or vehicle was infused into the cerebroventricle after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Behavioral outcomes were assessed by the Rotarod, corner, foot fault, and Morris water maze tests. Neuronal tissue loss was verified by 2 independent neuron markers. Markers of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglia were assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry. Results— Loss of IL-4 exacerbated sensorimotor deficits and impaired cognitive functions ≤21 days post injury. In contrast to the delayed deterioration of neurological functions, IL-4 deficiency increased neuronal tissue loss only in the acute phase (5 days) after stroke and had no impact on neuronal tissue loss 14 or 21 days post injury. Loss of IL-4 promoted expression of M1 microglia/macrophage markers and impaired expression of M2 markers at 5 and 14 days post injury. Administration of IL-4 into the ischemic brain also enhanced long-term functional recovery. Conclusions— The cytokine IL-4 improves long-term neurological outcomes after stroke, perhaps through M2 phenotype induction in microglia/macrophages. These results are the first to suggest that immunomodulation with IL-4 is a promising approach to promote long-term functional recovery after stroke.
Objective: To induce permanent focal cerebral ischemia by permanent occlusion of the distal middle cerebral artery and assess behavioral outcomes and neuronal tissue loss in wild-type and IL-4 knockout mice, with evaluation of microglial activation markers
This is a Permanent Distal Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 11 procedural steps, 4 equipment items, 2 materials. Extracted from a 2016 paper published in Stroke.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57/BL6 • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
~1 week study window
Core workflow
Surgical induction of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) • Surgical induction of permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO) • Cerebroventricular infusion of IL-4 or vehicle
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion was induced in wild-type and IL-4 knockout C57/BL6 mice
Note: Procedure performed on both WT and KO animals
“Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) or permanent distal MCAO (dMCAO) was induced in wild-type (WT) and IL-4 knockout (KO) C57/BL6 mice”
Permanent distal MCAO was induced in wild-type and IL-4 knockout C57/BL6 mice
Note: Permanent occlusion procedure performed on both WT and KO animals
“Transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) or permanent distal MCAO (dMCAO) was induced in wild-type (WT) and IL-4 knockout (KO) C57/BL6 mice”
In a separate cohort of WT animals, IL-4 or vehicle was infused into the cerebroventricle following tMCAO
Note: IL-4 dose: 60 ng/d; performed only in WT animals after tMCAO
“In a separate cohort of WT animals, IL-4 (60 ng/d for 7d) or vehicle was infused into the cerebroventricle after tMCAO”
Assessment of motor coordination and balance using Rotarod test
Note: One of multiple behavioral outcome measures
“Behavioral outcomes were assessed by the Rotarod, corner, foot fault, and Morris water maze tests”
Assessment of sensorimotor asymmetry using corner test
Note: One of multiple behavioral outcome measures
“Behavioral outcomes were assessed by the Rotarod, corner, foot fault, and Morris water maze tests”
Assessment of motor function and coordination using foot fault test
Note: One of multiple behavioral outcome measures
“Behavioral outcomes were assessed by the Rotarod, corner, foot fault, and Morris water maze tests”
Assessment of spatial learning and memory using Morris water maze
Note: One of multiple behavioral outcome measures
“Behavioral outcomes were assessed by the Rotarod, corner, foot fault, and Morris water maze tests”
Verification of neuronal tissue loss using two independent neuron markers
Note: Two independent markers used for verification
“Neuronal tissue loss was verified by two independent neuron markers”
Assessment of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglial markers using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Note: One of three methods used to assess microglial activation
“Markers of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglia were assessed by RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry”
Assessment of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglial markers using immunofluorescence
Note: One of three methods used to assess microglial activation
“Markers of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglia were assessed by RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry”
Assessment of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglial markers using flow cytometry
Note: One of three methods used to assess microglial activation
“Markers of classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) microglia were assessed by RT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
To induce permanent focal cerebral ischemia by permanent occlusion of the distal middle cerebral artery and assess behavioral outcomes and neuronal tissue loss in wild-type and IL-4 knockout mice, with evaluation of microglial activation markers
Objective
To induce permanent focal cerebral ischemia by permanent occlusion of the distal middle cerebral artery and assess behavioral outcomes and neuronal tissue loss in wild-type and IL-4 knockout mice, with evaluation of microglial activation markers
Subjects
From papermouse • C57/BL6 • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperWild-type (WT) and IL-4 knockout (KO) mice used; separate cohort of WT animals received IL-4 or vehicle infusion
Surgical induction of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) (Not specified)
Surgical induction of permanent distal middle cerebral artery occlusion (dMCAO) (Not specified)
Cerebroventricular infusion of IL-4 or vehicle (7 days)
Rotarod behavioral testing (Not specified)
Motor coordination and balance (Rotarod test)
From paperNot specified in methods text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Sensorimotor asymmetry (corner test)
From paperNot specified in methods text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Motor function and coordination (foot fault test)
From paperNot specified in methods text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze)
From paperNot specified in methods text
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Motor coordination and balance (Rotarod test)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Sensorimotor asymmetry (corner test)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Motor function and coordination (foot fault test)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in methods text
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Motor coordination and balance (Rotarod test); Sensorimotor asymmetry (corner test); Motor function and coordination (foot fault test); Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze).
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Motor coordination and balance (Rotarod test), Sensorimotor asymmetry (corner test), Motor function and coordination (foot fault test), Spatial learning and memory (Morris water maze).
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Xiangrong Liu et al. (2016). Interleukin-4 Is Essential for Microglia/Macrophage M2 Polarization and Long-Term Recovery After Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified
2 items with ReplicateScience direct pages
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Mar 14, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
11
Evidence Quotes
17
Protocol Items
6
Linked Products
2
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
11
Evidence
17
Specific Products
2/2
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.