Source Paper
Jesús Planagumà, Frank Leypoldt, Francesco Mannara, Javier Gutiérrez-Cuesta, Elena Martín-García et al.
Brain • 2014
Anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder that associates with prominent memory and behavioural deficits. Patients' antibodies react with the N-terminal domain of the GluN1 (previously known as NR1) subunit of NMDAR causing in cultured neurons a selective and reversible internalization of cell-surface receptors. These effects and the frequent response to immunotherapy have suggested an antibody-mediated pathogenesis, but to date there is no animal model showing that patients' antibodies cause memory and behavioural deficits. To develop such a model, C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps that delivered a continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid (flow rate 0.25 µl/h, 14 days). During and after the infusion period standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preference test), depressive-like behaviours (tail suspension, forced swimming tests), anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), and locomotor activity (horizontal and vertical). Animals sacrificed at Days 5, 13, 18, 26 and 46 were examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis. These experiments showed that animals infused with patients' cerebrospinal fluid, but not control cerebrospinal fluid, developed progressive memory deficits, and anhedonic and depressive-like behaviours, without affecting other behavioural or locomotor tasks. Memory deficits gradually worsened until Day 18 (4 days after the infusion stopped) and all symptoms resolved over the next week. Accompanying brain tissue studies showed progressive increase of brain-bound human antibodies, predominantly in the hippocampus (maximal on Days 13-18), that after acid extraction and characterization with GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells were confirmed to be against the NMDAR. Confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis of the hippocampus showed progressive decrease of the density of total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and total NMDAR protein concentration (maximal on Day 18), without affecting the post-synaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors. These effects occurred in parallel with memory and other behavioural deficits and gradually improved after Day 18, with reversibility of symptoms accompanied by a decrease of brain-bound antibodies and restoration of NMDAR levels. Overall, these findings establish a link between memory and behavioural deficits and antibody-mediated reduction of NMDAR, provide the biological basis by which removal of antibodies and antibody-producing cells improve neurological function, and offer a model for testing experimental therapies in this and similar disorders.
Objective: Assessment of aggressive behaviors using resident-intruder paradigm in mice receiving continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion
This is a Resident-Intruder Test protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 8 procedural steps, 10 equipment items, 1 materials. Extracted from a 2014 paper published in Brain.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57BL6/J • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Study window
~2 week study window
Core workflow
Surgical implantation of ventricular catheters and osmotic pumps • Continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion • Resident-intruder test for aggressiveness
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps for continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion
Note: Catheters connected to osmotic pumps delivering either patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid
“C57BL6/J mice underwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps that delivered a continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid”
Osmotic pumps deliver continuous infusion of cerebrospinal fluid into mouse brain
Note: Flow rate maintained at 0.25 µl/h throughout infusion period
“osmotic pumps that delivered a continuous infusion of patients' or control cerebrospinal fluid (flow rate 0.25 µl/h, 14 days)”
Standardized behavioral test applied during and after infusion period to assess aggressiveness in mice
Note: Test conducted as part of comprehensive behavioral assessment battery
“During and after the infusion period standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess aggressiveness (resident-intruder test)”
Standardized tests applied during and after infusion period including novel object recognition, sucrose preference, tail suspension, forced swimming, anxiety tests, and locomotor activity assessment
Note: Tests assess memory, anhedonic behaviors, depressive-like behaviors, anxiety, and locomotor activity
“standardized tests were applied, including tasks to assess memory (novel object recognition in open field and V-maze paradigms), anhedonic behaviours (sucrose preference test), depressive-like behaviours (tail suspension, forced swimming tests), anxiety (black and white, elevated plus maze tests), aggressiveness (resident-intruder test), and locomotor activity (horizontal and vertical)”
Animals sacrificed at specified timepoints for brain tissue analysis
Note: Sacrifice timepoints: Days 5, 13, 18, 26, and 46 post-infusion initiation
“Animals sacrificed at Days 5, 13, 18, 26 and 46 were examined for brain-bound antibodies”
Examination of brain tissue for brain-bound antibodies and antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters
Note: Analysis focused on hippocampus and effects on NMDAR clusters and protein concentration
“examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy”
Biochemical analysis of brain tissue to assess NMDAR protein concentration and related proteins
Note: Analysis of total NMDAR protein concentration, PSD95, and AMPA receptors
“examined for brain-bound antibodies and the antibody effects on total and synaptic NMDAR clusters and protein concentration using confocal microscopy and immunoblot analysis”
Brain tissue antibodies extracted and characterized using GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells to confirm NMDAR specificity
Note: Confirms antibodies are directed against NMDAR
“after acid extraction and characterization with GluN1-expressing human embryonic kidney cells were confirmed to be against the NMDAR”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Assessment of aggressive behaviors using resident-intruder paradigm in mice receiving continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion
Objective
Assessment of aggressive behaviors using resident-intruder paradigm in mice receiving continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion
Subjects
From papermouse • C57BL6/J • unknown • Not specified • Not specified
Cohort notes
From paperUnderwent placement of ventricular catheters connected to osmotic pumps
Surgical implantation of ventricular catheters and osmotic pumps (Not specified)
Continuous cerebrospinal fluid infusion (14 days)
Resident-intruder test for aggressiveness (Not specified)
Additional behavioral testing battery (Not specified)
Aggressiveness assessed via resident-intruder test
From paperNot explicitly specified in methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Memory deficits via novel object recognition and V-maze tasks
From paperNot explicitly specified in methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Anhedonic behaviors via sucrose preference test
From paperNot explicitly specified in methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Depressive-like behaviors via tail suspension and forced swimming tests
From paperNot explicitly specified in methods section
Artifact type
Representative image panels with region or marker comparisons
Comparison focus
Compare staining intensity, structure, or cell counts across matched conditions
Aggressiveness assessed via resident-intruder test
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Memory deficits via novel object recognition and V-maze tasks
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Anhedonic behaviors via sucrose preference test
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Depressive-like behaviors via tail suspension and forced swimming tests
From paperRaw artifact
Field or section images captured from matched samples
Processed artifact
Selected representative panels with quantified intensity, counts, or area measurements
Final reported form
Per-group imaging summaries with representative figures and quantified endpoints
Acquisition
Capture matched images from the relevant tissue region using the same acquisition settings across samples.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not explicitly specified in methods section
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Aggressiveness assessed via resident-intruder test; Memory deficits via novel object recognition and V-maze tasks; Anhedonic behaviors via sucrose preference test; Depressive-like behaviors via tail suspension and forced swimming tests.
Normalization
Normalize image-derived measurements against the matched acquisition or segmentation rules before comparing groups.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Aggressiveness assessed via resident-intruder test, Memory deficits via novel object recognition and V-maze tasks, Anhedonic behaviors via sucrose preference test, Depressive-like behaviors via tail suspension and forced swimming tests.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Jesús Planagumà et al. (2014). Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not specified
5 items with ReplicateScience direct pages
Estimated: $7,679.00
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Feb 28, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
8
Evidence Quotes
19
Protocol Items
11
Linked Products
5
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
8
Evidence
19
Specific Products
5/5
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Feb 28, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.