Source Paper
Francisco Pan-Montojo, Oleg Anichtchik, Yanina Dening, Lilla Knels, Stefan Pursche et al.
PLoS ONE • 2010
In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), the associated pathology follows a characteristic pattern involving inter alia the enteric nervous system (ENS), the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMV), the intermediolateral nucleus of the spinal cord and the substantia nigra, providing the basis for the neuropathological staging of the disease. Here we report that intragastrically administered rotenone, a commonly used pesticide that inhibits Complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, is able to reproduce PD pathological staging as found in patients. Our results show that low doses of chronically and intragastrically administered rotenone induce alpha-synuclein accumulation in all the above-mentioned nervous system structures of wild-type mice. Moreover, we also observed inflammation and alpha-synuclein phosphorylation in the ENS and DMV. HPLC analysis showed no rotenone levels in the systemic blood or the central nervous system (detection limit [rotenone]<20 nM) and mitochondrial Complex I measurements showed no systemic Complex I inhibition after 1.5 months of treatment. These alterations are sequential, appearing only in synaptically connected nervous structures, treatment time-dependent and accompanied by inflammatory signs and motor dysfunctions. These results strongly suggest that the local effect of pesticides on the ENS might be sufficient to induce PD-like progression and to reproduce the neuroanatomical and neurochemical features of PD staging. It provides new insight into how environmental factors could trigger PD and suggests a transsynaptic mechanism by which PD might spread throughout the central nervous system.
Objective: Assessment of motor coordination and balance by measuring time to fall from a rotating rod at increasing speeds
This is a Rotarod Test protocol using mouse as the model organism. The procedure involves 8 procedural steps, 1 equipment items, 6 materials. Extracted from a 2010 paper published in PLoS ONE.
Model and subjects
mouse • C57BL/6J • unknown • One-year old • Not specified • 20
Study window
~5 day study window
Core workflow
Animal housing and acclimation • Treatment administration • Rotarod test initiation
Primary readouts
Key equipment and reagents
Verified items
0
Direct vendor links
0
Use this page as an execution guide, then fall back to the source paper whenever you need exact exclusions, dosing details, or assay-specific caveats.
Confirm first
Use the page like this
Start here. The step list is optimized for running the experiment, with direct vendor links available inline when you need to source a cited item.
One-year old C57BL/6J mice were housed at room temperature under a 12-h light/dark cycle with ad libitum food and water access
Note: Mice were divided into four groups (n=5)
“One-year old C57BL/6J mice (Janvier, France) were housed at room temperature under a 12-h light/dark cycle. Food and water was provided ad libidum. Mice were divided into four groups (n=5)”
Rotenone solution or vehicle control administered via stomach tube at 0.01 ml/g animal weight. Treatment groups received rotenone at 5 mg/kg dose; control groups received vehicle only
Note: Rotenone solution composition: 0.625 mg/ml rotenone, 4% carboxymethylcellulose, 1.25% chloroform. Control vehicle: 4% carboxymethylcellulose and 1.25% chloroform
“treated 5 days a week for 1.5 and 3 months. A stomach tube was used to administer 0.01 ml/g animal weight of rotenone solution (0.625 mg/ml rotenone (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), 4% carboxymethylcellulose (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 1.25% chloroform (Carl Roth, Germany)) corresponding to a 5 mg/kg dose”
Mice were placed on a rotating rod starting at an initial speed of 4 rpm
Note: Test performed after 1.5 and 3 month treatment periods
“The rotarod test was performed after 1.5 and 3 month treatment as already described by others [37]. Briefly, mice were place on a rotating rod with a initial speed of 4 rpm”
The speed of rotation was gradually increased at a rate of 0.3 rpm/sec throughout the test
Note: Speed increase continues until mouse falls from rod
“The speed of rotation was gradually increased (0,3 rpm/sec) and the rodent's ability to remain on the rotating rod (time to the first fall) was recorded”
Time from rod start until the first fall of the mouse was recorded as the primary outcome measure
Note: This measurement reflects motor coordination and balance ability
“the rodent's ability to remain on the rotating rod (time to the first fall) was recorded”
The rotarod test was repeated three times per day on each animal over three consecutive days
Note: Multiple trials allow for assessment of learning and consistency of motor performance
“The test was repeated three times a day on each animal over three consecutive days”
Blood was extracted from the retina plexus using a glass capillary under general anesthesia with ketamine for HPLC analysis
Note: Performed under general anesthesia (0.01 ml/g ketamine i.p.)
“Blood extraction for High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis was obtained from the retia plexus using a glass capillary under general anaesthesia (0.01 ml/g of Ketamin i.p.)”
Central nervous system tissue was obtained after cervical dislocation
Note: Performed after blood extraction
“CNS-tissue was obtained after cervical dislocation”
This section explains what the experiment is doing, which readouts matter, what the data artifacts usually look like, and how the analysis should flow from raw capture to reported result.
Assessment of motor coordination and balance by measuring time to fall from a rotating rod at increasing speeds
Objective
Assessment of motor coordination and balance by measuring time to fall from a rotating rod at increasing speeds
Subjects
From papermouse • C57BL/6J • unknown • One-year old • Not specified
Sample count
From paper20
Cohort notes
From paperMice were divided into four groups (n=5).
Animal housing and acclimation (Not specified)
Treatment administration (5 days per week for 1.5 and 3 months)
Rotarod test initiation (Not specified)
Speed increase protocol (Not specified)
Time to first fall from rotating rod (latency to fall)
From paperNot specified in methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Motor coordination ability
From paperNot specified in methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Balance performance
From paperNot specified in methods section
Artifact type
Endpoint measurements summarized by group or timepoint
Comparison focus
Compare endpoint magnitude between groups, timepoints, or both
Time to first fall from rotating rod (latency to fall)
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Motor coordination ability
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Balance performance
From paperRaw artifact
Per-sample or per-animal endpoint measurements collected during the experiment
Processed artifact
Structured table with cleaned measurements ready for comparison
Final reported form
Summary statistics and between-group or across-timepoint comparisons
Acquisition
Collect raw experimental outputs with enough metadata to preserve sample identity, condition, and timing.
Preprocessing / cleaning
Not specified in methods section
Scoring or quantification
Quantify the primary readouts for this experiment: Time to first fall from rotating rod (latency to fall); Motor coordination ability; Balance performance.
Statistical comparison
Statistical method not yet structured for this page.
Reporting output
Report representative outputs alongside summary comparisons for Time to first fall from rotating rod (latency to fall), Motor coordination ability, Balance performance.
Source links and direct wording from the methods section for validation and deeper review.
Citation
Francisco Pan-Montojo et al. (2010). Progression of Parkinson's Disease Pathology Is Reproduced by Intragastric Administration of Rotenone in Mice. PLoS ONE
“”
“”
“”
“”
Direct vendor pages are linked from the protocol above. This section stays focused on the full comparison view and the prep checklist.
Gather these items before starting the experiment. Check off items as you prepare.
Not specified • Not specified • Not specified • Not specified
Sigma-Aldrich • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
Sigma-Aldrich • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
Carl Roth • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
Not specified • Not applicable • Not specified • Not specified
1 item with ReplicateScience direct pages
Use this section as the page quality checkpoint. It keeps section navigation, evidence access, readiness, and verification meaning in one place.
Current status surfaces were computed from experiment data updated Mar 14, 2026.
Source access
Jump back into the original paper or the methods evidence section when you need exact wording, exclusions, or method-specific caveats.
This protocol has structured steps plus evidence quotes, and is ready for canonical sync.
Steps
8
Evidence Quotes
15
Protocol Items
7
Linked Products
1
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this means
The completeness score reflects how much structured protocol data is present: steps, methods evidence, listed materials, linked products, and paper provenance.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
Canonical Sync shows whether a ConductGraph-backed protocol is available for this experiment route right now. It is a sync-status signal, not a claim that every downstream vendor link or step detail is perfect.
Steps
8
Evidence
15
Specific Products
1/1
Canonical Sync
Pending
What this score means
The verification score reflects evidence coverage, subject detail, paper provenance, step depth, and whether linked products resolve to specific item pages instead of generic searches.
Computed from the current experiment record updated Mar 14, 2026.
A page can have structured steps and still need review when evidence is thin, product links are generic, or canonical protocol coverage is still pending.