ReplicateScience
TestsPapersMethodologyAboutOffline
Submit a paper
ReplicateScience

Records of how behavioral tests were run, taken from open-access papers. Built by ConductScience.

Browse

  • Tests
  • Papers
  • Scientists
  • Institutions

About

  • Methodology
  • About
  • Submit a paper
  • Offline edition
  • ConductScience

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2026 ConductScience. All rights reserved.

Tests/Open field test

Open field test

How 11 papers set up this test.

AI read these papers and code checked every quote. No person has reviewed the records yet. How records are made

Arena size

Inner dimensions of the arena (floor and wall height)

PaperValuePaper’s words
Kodali et al. 2024Rats
  • 100 cm × 100 cm

“a brightly lit open field apparatus (100 cm × 100 cm Plexiglas open field box)”
Liu et al. 2024Mice
  • 27.3 cm × 27.3 cm square base with 20.3 cm high walls

“A clear box (27.3 cm × 27.3 cm square base with 20.3 cm high walls) was used for the open field test”
Wen et al. 2024Mice
  • 16″×16.5″×12″

“a custom made chamber (16″×16.5″×12″)”
Li et al. 2023Mice
  • 45 cm × 45 cm × 30 cm

“a white opaque arena of 45 cm × 45 cm × 30 cm in size”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice
  • 40 × 40 cm

“a standardized arena of 40 × 40 cm”
Somebang et al. 2021Mice
  • 40 × 40 inches

“inside a plexiglass enclosure (40 × 40 inches)”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice
  • 45 × 45 cm

“Mice were tested in an open field (45 × 45 cm)”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice
  • diameter 36 cm

“A circular open‐field arena was constructed in house with diameter 36 cm”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats
  • Unclear

    60-cm length × 60-cm width × 40-cm height

    The open field section gives no arena. This is the only box called an open field box, but it is described for the novel object recognition test and the passages do not say the open field test used it.

“The recognition test was performed in a gray open field box (60-cm length × 60-cm width × 40-cm height)”
Puech et al. 2025Mice
  • Cited to other work

    No chamber dimensions are printed. One passage makes this test the habituation phase of the NOR test, and another passage sends the reader to other work for the NOR test.

“The NOR test has been previously extensively described [32,64,65,70]”

Not in the Methods of Rattner et al. 2020.

Session duration

How long one session in the apparatus lasts

PaperValuePaper’s words
Puech et al. 2025Mice
  • 10 min

“The animals were allowed to explore the open field for 10 min”
“The habituation phase allows mice to explore the open field for 10 min”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats
  • 5 min

“Their movements were recorded using the Any-maze video tracking system for 5 min”
Liu et al. 2024Mice
  • 1 h

“Movements were recorded (Med Associates, ENV-510) for 1 h in 5 min bins”
Wen et al. 2024Mice
  • 10 min

“Activity was recorded for 10 min for each animal once a day for two consecutive days”
Li et al. 2023Mice
  • 5 min

“The open field test consisted of 5 min trial”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice
  • 6–10 min

“Each mouse was placed individually for 6–10 min in the square black plastic chamber”
Somebang et al. 2021Mice
  • 10 min/day

“Animals were tested for 10 min/day for two days.”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice
  • 60 min

“Each mouse was allowed to explore the apparatus for 60 min”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice
  • In the dark

    2 min

  • After light was switched on

    2 min

“Their activity was recorded for 2 min followed by 2 min of illumination of the chamber”
“tracked for 2 min in the dark and for 2 min after light was switched on”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats
  • Habituation

    Unclear

    10 minutes

    The open field section gives no duration. This is the habituation phase of the novel object recognition test, and the passages do not say whether this empty-box exposure is the open field test.

“rats were placed in the right corner of the open field box and allowed to explore the box devoid of objects for 10 minutes”

Not in the Methods of Rattner et al. 2020.

Illumination

Light level in or over the apparatus during testing

PaperValuePaper’s words
Kodali et al. 2024Rats
  • brightly lit

“individually placed in the center of a brightly lit open field apparatus”
Wen et al. 2024Mice
  • 110–130 lux

“All testing was conducted under 110–130 lux of lighting across the chamber”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice
  • Upon LED illumination

    ~10^15 photons cm^−2 s^−1

“The irradiance of the open field upon LED illumination was ~10^15 photons cm^−2 s^−1”
Puech et al. 2025Mice
  • Cited to other work

    No light level is printed. One passage makes this test the habituation phase of the NOR test, and another passage sends the reader to other work for the NOR test.

“The NOR test has been previously extensively described [32,64,65,70]”

Not in the Methods of Liu et al. 2024, Li et al. 2023, Talalai et al. 2023, Vanderplow et al. 2022, Somebang et al. 2021, Rattner et al. 2020, Drapeau et al. 2018.

Center zone size

Size of the area scored as the center of the arena

PaperValuePaper’s words
Wen et al. 2024Mice
  • a length and width half the length and width of the chamber

“The center of the open field was defined as the central zone with a length and width half the length and width of the chamber”
Li et al. 2023Mice
  • Unclear

    nine square quadrants

    Time is scored in the central quadrant of an arena divided into nine equal squares, which implies a center of one ninth of the floor, but no size for the center zone is printed.

“The test arena was divided equally into nine square quadrants”
“the time spent in the central quadrant of the open field”

Not in the Methods of Puech et al. 2025, Kodali et al. 2024, Liu et al. 2024, Talalai et al. 2023, Vanderplow et al. 2022, Somebang et al. 2021, Rattner et al. 2020, Drapeau et al. 2018, Sengupta et al. 2016.

Other settings the papers report (54)

Settings outside the list above, named as each paper names them.

PaperSetting and valuePaper’s words
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

590‐nm LED light sources

Ten

“Ten 590‐nm LED light sources”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Activity was recorded

once a day for two consecutive days

“Activity was recorded for 10 min for each animal once a day for two consecutive days”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

After the injection, Day 3

two days

“in the open field paradigm, two days after the injection (Day 3)”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

After the injection, Day 5

four days

“conducting the behavioral paradigm four days after the injection (Day 5)”
Somebang et al. 2021Mice

Animals were tested

two days

“Animals were tested for 10 min/day for two days.”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Apparatus was cleaned, between sessions

70% ethanol

“The apparatus was cleaned with 70% ethanol between sessions”
Li et al. 2023Mice

Arena

white opaque

“a white opaque arena”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Behavioral experiments were conducted

between 9 A.M. and 5 P.M.

“Behavioral experiments were conducted between 9 A.M. and 5 P.M.”
Liu et al. 2024Mice

Bins

5 min bins

“Movements were recorded (Med Associates, ENV-510) for 1 h in 5 min bins”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats

Blinded

to group identification of animals or samples

“The investigators who performed the neurobehavioral tests, immunohistochemical or immunofluorescence quantifications, as well as biochemical assays remained blinded to group identification of animals or samples”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Chamber

blue opaque open-field plastic

“a blue opaque open-field plastic chamber”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Chamber

opaque black walls and white floor

“a custom made chamber (16″×16.5″×12″) with opaque black walls and white floor”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Chamber

square black plastic

“in the square black plastic chamber”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Cleaned with

70% ethanol

“the experimental set-ups were cleaned with 70% ethanol to prevent odor cues”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Conducted

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.

“conducted by three observers between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

Dark adapted

30 min

“blind rd1 control mice were dark adapted for 30 min before being placed in the center”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats

Experimenter

blinded to conditions

“flagged by an experimenter blinded to conditions”
Rattner et al. 2020Mice

Experimenters

blind to the genotype

“During all behavioral testing, the experimenters were blind to the genotype”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Habituated in the testing room

at least 30 min

“All animals were habituated in the testing room at least 30 min before testing starts”
Liu et al. 2024Mice

Habituated to the test room

at least 20 min

“Before testing, mice were habituated to the test room for at least 20 min.”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Habituation

day 2

“day 2—habituation”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats

Individually placed

in the center

“The rats from different groups were individually placed in the center of a brightly lit open field apparatus”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

LED light sources

590‐nm

“Ten 590‐nm LED light sources”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Locomotor activity monitored

the first 5 min

“with locomotor activity monitored during the first 5 min”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Made from

inert plastic

“made from inert plastic”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Measures were recorded

10-min intervals

“Measures were recorded in 10-min intervals”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Mice were brought to the front room of the testing area

at least half an hour

“Mice were brought to the front room of the testing area at least half an hour before the start of experiments”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats

Neurobehavioral tasks

during the daytime

“animals in all groups were tested with a series of neurobehavioral tasks during the daytime”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Observers

three

“conducted by three observers between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats

Open field box

Plexiglas

“100 cm × 100 cm Plexiglas open field box”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Open field second run, second run

day 5

“day 5—open field second run”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Open field test first run, first run

day 3

“day 3—open field test first run”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Operators

blinded to the exposure

“performed by operators who were blinded to the exposure”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Order of tests

Day 1–2

“Day 1–2, open field”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Placed

in the center

“mice were placed in the center of a blue opaque open-field plastic chamber”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Placed

in the center

“Each mouse was placed in the center of a custom made chamber”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Placed

individually

“Each mouse was placed individually”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

Placed

in the center

“blind rd1 control mice were dark adapted for 30 min before being placed in the center”
Talalai et al. 2023Mice

Placed in the experimental room, prior to the test

one hour

“all the animals were placed in the experimental room one hour prior to the test”
Li et al. 2023Mice

Placed into

the central quadrant of the open field

“Each mouse was placed into the central quadrant of the open field”
Somebang et al. 2021Mice

Post-TBI

3 weeks

“starting at 3 weeks post-TBI”
Puech et al. 2025Mice

Recorded

from a vertical point of view

“The tests were recorded from a vertical point of view with a video camera suspended above the experimental area”
Wen et al. 2024Mice

Rest in between tests

at least a 1-day

“Animals were given at least a 1-day rest in between tests”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

Run during the dark phase of the mice

between 18 and 21 h

“All behavior experiments were run during the dark phase of the mice between 18 and 21 h”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Spontaneous grooming bouts

10 first minutes

“spontaneous grooming bouts observed during the 10 first minutes of the open field test”
Liu et al. 2024Mice

Start position

in the center of the box

“Mice were placed in the center of the box at the start of the assay.”
Kodali et al. 2024Rats

Tested with a series of neurobehavioral tasks

Starting from the 11th week after VEH/CBD treatment

“Starting from the 11th week after VEH/CBD treatment, animals in all groups were tested with a series of neurobehavioral tasks”
Liu et al. 2024Mice

The center zone

36% of the total area

“the center zone was 36% of the total area”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats

The order from first to last

Y-maze, open field, novel object recognition, social interaction, and social novelty

“with the order from first to last as the following: Y-maze, open field, novel object recognition, social interaction, and social novelty”
Sengupta et al. 2016Mice

Video camera

night vision mode

“Activity in the arena was recorded during the test by a video camera (Handycam, Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in night vision mode”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats

Video playback

0.3 real-time speed

“During video playback in AnyMaze at 0.3 real-time speed”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Virtually divided into

central and peripheral regions

“virtually divided into central and peripheral regions”
Drapeau et al. 2018Mice

Wall rears

while touching a side of the open field

“wall rears (while touching a side of the open field)”
Vanderplow et al. 2022Rats

Zones

outer, middle, and center zones

“After establishing the location of outer, middle, and center zones”

Apparatus

What each paper names for this test. Vendors and models appear as the paper prints them.

PaperApparatusPaper’s words
Puech et al. 2025

Video camera

“The tests were recorded from a vertical point of view with a video camera suspended above the experimental area”
Puech et al. 2025

Noldus Ethovision XT17 Software

“All the experiments were interfaced with a video tracking system (Noldus Ethovision XT17 Software, Leesburg, VA, USA)”
Puech et al. 2025

Blue opaque open-field plastic chamber

“mice were placed in the center of a blue opaque open-field plastic chamber”
Kodali et al. 2024

Any-maze video tracking system

“Their movements were recorded using the Any-maze video tracking system for 5 min”
Kodali et al. 2024

Open field apparatus

“a brightly lit open field apparatus (100 cm × 100 cm Plexiglas open field box)”
Liu et al. 2024

Clear box

“A clear box (27.3 cm × 27.3 cm square base with 20.3 cm high walls) was used for the open field test”
Liu et al. 2024

Med Associates, ENV-510

“Movements were recorded (Med Associates, ENV-510) for 1 h in 5 min bins”
Wen et al. 2024

EthoVision XT 17 system

Noldus Information Technology

“EthoVision XT 17 system (Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, Netherlands)”
Wen et al. 2024

Custom made chamber

“a custom made chamber (16″×16.5″×12″)”
Li et al. 2023

White opaque arena

Maze Engineers, Boston, USA

“a white opaque arena of 45 cm × 45 cm × 30 cm in size (Maze Engineers, Boston, USA)”
Li et al. 2023

Camera

“was recorded by the camera”
Li et al. 2023

ANY-mazeTM video-tracking software

Stoelting Co., Chicago, IL, USA

“analyzed using ANY-mazeTM video-tracking software (Stoelting Co., Chicago, IL, USA)”
Talalai et al. 2023

Standardized arena

Maze Engineers, Skokie, IL, USA

“a standardized arena of 40 × 40 cm made from inert plastic (Maze Engineers, Skokie, IL, USA)”
Talalai et al. 2023

Camera

“Mice movements were recorded using a camera”
Talalai et al. 2023

EthoVision XT

Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands

“movement tracking and automatic scoring were performed using EthoVision XT 11.5 (Noldus, Wageningen, The Netherlands) software”
Vanderplow et al. 2022

Overhead digital video camera

“All animal behaviors were videotaped with an overhead digital video camera.”
Vanderplow et al. 2022

AnyMaze video tracking software

Wood Dale, IL, USA

“locomotor behavior was semiautomatically analyzed using AnyMaze video tracking software (Wood Dale, IL, USA)”
Somebang et al. 2021

Plexiglass enclosure

“inside a plexiglass enclosure (40 × 40 inches)”
Somebang et al. 2021

Automated infrared photocells

“surrounded by automated infrared photocells”
Somebang et al. 2021

Computer

“connected to a computer with KinderScientific software”
Somebang et al. 2021

KinderScientific software

Hamilton & Kinder

“KinderScientific software (Hamilton & Kinder) to record data”
Drapeau et al. 2018

Noldus Ethovision

“Animal activity was recorded by video tracking (Noldus Ethovision)”
Drapeau et al. 2018

Open field

“Mice were tested in an open field (45 × 45 cm)”
Sengupta et al. 2016

Circular open‐field arena

“A circular open‐field arena was constructed in house with diameter 36 cm using an aluminum sheet folded in a circle placed over a plexiglass base (similar to the one described in Polosukhina et al, 2012).”
Sengupta et al. 2016

590‐nm LED light sources

Lumitronix, Graefelfing, Germany, Cree XP‐E

“Ten 590‐nm LED light sources (Cree XP‐E, Lumitronix, Graefelfing, Germany) were glued to the wall of the open‐field arena.”
Sengupta et al. 2016

Handheld spectrophotometer

Thorlabs, Germany, PM100D

“as measured approximately at the level of the mice's eyes using a handheld spectrophotometer (PM100D, Thorlabs, Germany)”
Sengupta et al. 2016

Video camera

Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, Handycam

“Activity in the arena was recorded during the test by a video camera (Handycam, Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) in night vision mode.”
Sengupta et al. 2016

Ethovision XT

Noldus Information Technology, Leesburg, VA

“The movies were analyzed using mouse behavior phenotyping and motion tracking software Ethovision XT build 8.0 (Noldus Information Technology, Leesburg, VA).”

No apparatus named in Rattner et al. 2020.